<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/plugins/seriously-simple-podcasting/templates/feed-stylesheet.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"
	 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	 xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	 xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"
	 xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
	>
		<channel>
		<title>School of Government Podcasts</title>
		<atom:link href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/feed/podcast/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/</link>
		<description>As the largest university-based local government training, advisory, and research organization in the United States, the School of Government serves more than 12,000 public officials each year. The mission of the School of Government is to improve the lives of North Carolinians by engaging in practical scholarship that helps public officials and citizens understand and improve state and local government. Our podcasts support this mission. The School is nonpartisan, policy-neutral and responsive.</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:21:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<copyright>School of Government</copyright>
		<itunes:subtitle>Let&#039;s play it by ear!</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:author>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill</itunes:author>
		<itunes:type>serial</itunes:type>
		<itunes:summary>As the largest university-based local government training, advisory, and research organization in the United States, the School of Government serves more than 12,000 public officials each year. The mission of the School of Government is to improve the lives of North Carolinians by engaging in practical scholarship that helps public officials and citizens understand and improve state and local government. Our podcasts support this mission. The School is nonpartisan, policy-neutral and responsive.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name>University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill</itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>podcast@sog.unc.edu</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Podcast_SOG__Icon.png"></itunes:image>
			
		<itunes:category text="Government &amp; Organizations">
			<itunes:category text="Regional"></itunes:category>
		</itunes:category>
		<itunes:category text="Education">
									<itunes:category text="Higher Education"></itunes:category>
							</itunes:category>
		<googleplay:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></googleplay:author>
			<googleplay:email>podcast@sog.unc.edu</googleplay:email>
			<googleplay:description></googleplay:description>
			<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
			<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Podcast_SOG__Icon.png"></googleplay:image>
			<podcast:locked owner="podcast@sog.unc.edu">yes</podcast:locked>
		<podcast:guid>f130aefa-e829-505e-a8e6-cb639e023006</podcast:guid>
		
		<!-- podcast_generator="SSP by Castos/2.22.0" Seriously Simple Podcasting plugin for WordPress (https://wordpress.org/plugins/seriously-simple-podcasting/) -->
		<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>

<item>
	<title>Episode 34: Oaks, Braswell, and Robinson</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2026/04/01/episode-34-oaks-braswell-and-robinson/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-34-oaks-braswell-and-robinson</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1107</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on January 7 and January 21 of 2026. In State v. Oakes, No. COA25-247 (N.C. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2026), the Court of Appeals concluded that a voicemail was sufficiently authenticated by voice [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on January 7 and January 21 of 2026. In State v. Oakes, No. COA25-247 (N.C. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2026), the Court of Appeals concluded that a voicemail was ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on January 7 and January 21 of 2026. In State v. Oakes, No. COA25-247 (N.C. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2026), the Court of Appeals concluded that a voicemail was sufficiently authenticated by voice [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1107/episode-34-oaks-braswell-and-robinson.mp3" length="58001640" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on January 7 and January 21 of 2026. In State v. Oakes, No. COA25-247 (N.C. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2026), the Court of Appeals concluded that a voicemail was sufficiently authenticated by voice [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>40:15</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on January 7 and January 21 of 2026. In State v. Oakes, No. COA25-247 (N.C. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2026), the Court of Appeals concluded that a voicemail was sufficiently authenticated by voice [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 33: White, Leggett, and Phillips</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2026/03/17/episode-33-white-leggett-and-phillips/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-33-white-leggett-and-phillips</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1101</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on January 7, 2026. In State v. White, No. COA25-470 (N.C. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2026), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress when [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on January 7, 2026. In State v. White, No. COA25-470 (N.C. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2026), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on January 7, 2026. In State v. White, No. COA25-470 (N.C. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2026), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress when [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1101/episode-33-white-leggett-and-phillips.mp3" length="56816894" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on January 7, 2026. In State v. White, No. COA25-470 (N.C. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2026), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress when [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>39:26</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on January 7, 2026. In State v. White, No. COA25-470 (N.C. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2026), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress when [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 32: Calderon, Allison, and Ford</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2026/03/02/episode-32-calderon-allison-and-ford/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-32-calderon-allison-and-ford</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 17:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1095</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Supreme Court on December 12, 2025. In State v. Calderon, No. 238A23 (N.C. Dec. 12, 2025), the Supreme Court applied the distinct-interruption test and found sufficient evidence to support three separate convictions for indecent liberties with [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Supreme Court on December 12, 2025. In State v. Calderon, No. 238A23 (N.C. Dec. 12, 2025), the Supreme Court applied the distinct-interruption test and found sufficient ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Supreme Court on December 12, 2025. In State v. Calderon, No. 238A23 (N.C. Dec. 12, 2025), the Supreme Court applied the distinct-interruption test and found sufficient evidence to support three separate convictions for indecent liberties with [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1095/episode-32-calderon-allison-and-ford.mp3" length="54180628" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Supreme Court on December 12, 2025. In State v. Calderon, No. 238A23 (N.C. Dec. 12, 2025), the Supreme Court applied the distinct-interruption test and found sufficient evidence to support three separate convictions for indecent liberties with [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>37:36</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Supreme Court on December 12, 2025. In State v. Calderon, No. 238A23 (N.C. Dec. 12, 2025), the Supreme Court applied the distinct-interruption test and found sufficient evidence to support three separate convictions for indecent liberties with [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 24: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2026/03/02/episode-24-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-24-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 16:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1090</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent decisions state and federal cases. Topics include the emergency aid exception to the warrant requirement, free speech issues in criminal cases, substitute analyst issues, and the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers recent decisions state and federal cases. Topics include the emergency aid exception to the warrant requirement, free speech issues in criminal cases, substitute analyst issues, and the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers recent decisions state and federal cases. Topics include the emergency aid exception to the warrant requirement, free speech issues in criminal cases, substitute analyst issues, and the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1090/episode-24-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="64896473" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers recent decisions state and federal cases. Topics include the emergency aid exception to the warrant requirement, free speech issues in criminal cases, substitute analyst issues, and the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>45:03</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent decisions state and federal cases. Topics include the emergency aid exception to the warrant requirement, free speech issues in criminal cases, substitute analyst issues, and the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 31: Kleist, Allen, and McKoy</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2026/02/17/episode-31-kleist-allen-and-mckoy/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-31-kleist-allen-and-mckoy</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 20:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1085</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 3, 2025. In State v. Kleist, No. COA24-677 (N.C. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2025), the Court of Appeals found insufficient evidence of aiding and abetting child sex crimes and felony child [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 3, 2025. In State v. Kleist, No. COA24-677 (N.C. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2025), the Court of Appeals found insufficient evidence of aiding and abet]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 3, 2025. In State v. Kleist, No. COA24-677 (N.C. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2025), the Court of Appeals found insufficient evidence of aiding and abetting child sex crimes and felony child [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1085/episode-31-kleist-allen-and-mckoy.mp3" length="50003072" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 3, 2025. In State v. Kleist, No. COA24-677 (N.C. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2025), the Court of Appeals found insufficient evidence of aiding and abetting child sex crimes and felony child [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>34:42</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 3, 2025. In State v. Kleist, No. COA24-677 (N.C. Ct. App. Dec. 3, 2025), the Court of Appeals found insufficient evidence of aiding and abetting child sex crimes and felony child [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 30: Johnson, Vaughn, and Mathews</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2026/02/02/episode-30-johnson-vaughn-and-mathews/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-30-johnson-vaughn-and-mathews</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 21:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1080</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 5 and 19, 2025. In State v. Johnson, No. COA24-1126 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s request for [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 5 and 19, 2025. In State v. Johnson, No. COA24-1126 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the d]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 5 and 19, 2025. In State v. Johnson, No. COA24-1126 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s request for [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1080/episode-30-johnson-vaughn-and-mathews.mp3" length="39062038" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 5 and 19, 2025. In State v. Johnson, No. COA24-1126 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s request for [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>27:06</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 5 and 19, 2025. In State v. Johnson, No. COA24-1126 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s request for [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 29: Barthel, Wilson, and Hickman</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2026/01/20/episode-29-barthel-wilson-and-hickman/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-29-barthel-wilson-and-hickman</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 14:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1074</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 5, 2025. In State v. Barthel, No. COA25-159 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2025), the Court of Appeals vacated the defendant’s convictions arising from the display of a vulgar banner at [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 5, 2025. In State v. Barthel, No. COA25-159 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2025), the Court of Appeals vacated the defendant’s convictions arising f]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 5, 2025. In State v. Barthel, No. COA25-159 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2025), the Court of Appeals vacated the defendant’s convictions arising from the display of a vulgar banner at [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1074/episode-29-barthel-wilson-and-hickman.mp3" length="42037164" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 5, 2025. In State v. Barthel, No. COA25-159 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2025), the Court of Appeals vacated the defendant’s convictions arising from the display of a vulgar banner at [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>29:10</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 5, 2025. In State v. Barthel, No. COA25-159 (N.C. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2025), the Court of Appeals vacated the defendant’s convictions arising from the display of a vulgar banner at [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 28: Chemuti, Wilson, and Rogers</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2026/01/12/episode-28-chemuti-wilson-and-rogers/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-28-chemuti-wilson-and-rogers</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 15:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1068</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Supreme Court on Oct. 17, 2025. In State v. Chemuti, No. 282PA24 (N.C. Oct. 17, 2025), the Supreme Court ruled that defendants cannot compel the production of body camera footage and other recordings in the custody [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Supreme Court on Oct. 17, 2025. In State v. Chemuti, No. 282PA24 (N.C. Oct. 17, 2025), the Supreme Court ruled that defendants cannot compel the production of body camer]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Supreme Court on Oct. 17, 2025. In State v. Chemuti, No. 282PA24 (N.C. Oct. 17, 2025), the Supreme Court ruled that defendants cannot compel the production of body camera footage and other recordings in the custody [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1068/episode-28-chemuti-wilson-and-rogers.mp3" length="55585432" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Supreme Court on Oct. 17, 2025. In State v. Chemuti, No. 282PA24 (N.C. Oct. 17, 2025), the Supreme Court ruled that defendants cannot compel the production of body camera footage and other recordings in the custody [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>38:35</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Supreme Court on Oct. 17, 2025. In State v. Chemuti, No. 282PA24 (N.C. Oct. 17, 2025), the Supreme Court ruled that defendants cannot compel the production of body camera footage and other recordings in the custody [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title> Episode 27: Lamm, Ramsey, and Pardo</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2026/01/05/episode-27-lamm-ramsey-and-pardo/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-27-lamm-ramsey-and-pardo</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 17:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1064</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on Oct. 1, 2025. In State v. Lamm, No. COA24-982 (N.C. Ct. App. Oct. 1, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that a prior acquittal did not collaterally estop the State from presenting [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on Oct. 1, 2025. In State v. Lamm, No. COA24-982 (N.C. Ct. App. Oct. 1, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that a prior acquittal did not collaterally est]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on Oct. 1, 2025. In State v. Lamm, No. COA24-982 (N.C. Ct. App. Oct. 1, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that a prior acquittal did not collaterally estop the State from presenting [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1064/episode-27-lamm-ramsey-and-pardo.mp3" length="48630894" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on Oct. 1, 2025. In State v. Lamm, No. COA24-982 (N.C. Ct. App. Oct. 1, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that a prior acquittal did not collaterally estop the State from presenting [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>33:45</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on Oct. 1, 2025. In State v. Lamm, No. COA24-982 (N.C. Ct. App. Oct. 1, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that a prior acquittal did not collaterally estop the State from presenting [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 23: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/12/18/episode-23-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-23-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 21:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1059</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent federal developments regarding hemp, as well as recent decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals on Good Samaritan immunity, offers of compromise, and fighting words.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers recent federal developments regarding hemp, as well as recent decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals on Good Samaritan immunity, offers of compromise, and fighting words.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers recent federal developments regarding hemp, as well as recent decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals on Good Samaritan immunity, offers of compromise, and fighting words.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1059/episode-23-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="72264751" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers recent federal developments regarding hemp, as well as recent decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals on Good Samaritan immunity, offers of compromise, and fighting words.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>50:10</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent federal developments regarding hemp, as well as recent decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals on Good Samaritan immunity, offers of compromise, and fighting words.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 26: Chafen, Thomas, and Creed</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/12/15/episode-26-chafen-thomas-and-creed/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-26-chafen-thomas-and-creed</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 16:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1055</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 17, 2025. In State v. Chafen, No. COA24-1030 (N.C. Ct. App. Sept. 17, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error when there was insufficient evidence to raise a bona fide [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 17, 2025. In State v. Chafen, No. COA24-1030 (N.C. Ct. App. Sept. 17, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error when there was insufficien]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 17, 2025. In State v. Chafen, No. COA24-1030 (N.C. Ct. App. Sept. 17, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error when there was insufficient evidence to raise a bona fide [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1055/episode-26-chafen-thomas-and-creed.mp3" length="47743940" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 17, 2025. In State v. Chafen, No. COA24-1030 (N.C. Ct. App. Sept. 17, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error when there was insufficient evidence to raise a bona fide [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>33:08</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 17, 2025. In State v. Chafen, No. COA24-1030 (N.C. Ct. App. Sept. 17, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error when there was insufficient evidence to raise a bona fide [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 22: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/12/10/episode-22-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-22-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1050</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Episode 22 discusses recent cases from the North Carolina Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals covering North Carolina’s recent adoption of the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, access to law enforcement recordings by district court defendants, and North Carolina’s felon disenfranchisement law.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Episode 22 discusses recent cases from the North Carolina Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals covering North Carolina’s recent adoption of the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, access to law enforcement recordings by distri]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Episode 22 discusses recent cases from the North Carolina Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals covering North Carolina’s recent adoption of the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, access to law enforcement recordings by district court defendants, and North Carolina’s felon disenfranchisement law.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1050/episode-22-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="70430277" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Episode 22 discusses recent cases from the North Carolina Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals covering North Carolina’s recent adoption of the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, access to law enforcement recordings by district court defendants, and North Carolina’s felon disenfranchisement law.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>48:53</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Episode 22 discusses recent cases from the North Carolina Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals covering North Carolina’s recent adoption of the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, access to law enforcement recordings by district court defendants, and North Carolina’s felon disenfranchisement law.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 25: Powell, Watkins, and Quiterio-Morrison</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/12/08/episode-25-powell-watkins-and-quiterio-morrison/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-25-powell-watkins-and-quiterio-morrison</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 20:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1045</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 3, 2025. In State v. Powell, No. COA24-556 (N.C. Ct. App. Sept. 3, 2025), the Court of Appeals awarded the defendant a new trial when the trial court erred by failing [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 3, 2025. In State v. Powell, No. COA24-556 (N.C. Ct. App. Sept. 3, 2025), the Court of Appeals awarded the defendant a new trial when the t]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 3, 2025. In State v. Powell, No. COA24-556 (N.C. Ct. App. Sept. 3, 2025), the Court of Appeals awarded the defendant a new trial when the trial court erred by failing [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1045/episode-25-powell-watkins-and-quiterio-morrison.mp3" length="44518426" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 3, 2025. In State v. Powell, No. COA24-556 (N.C. Ct. App. Sept. 3, 2025), the Court of Appeals awarded the defendant a new trial when the trial court erred by failing [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>30:54</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 3, 2025. In State v. Powell, No. COA24-556 (N.C. Ct. App. Sept. 3, 2025), the Court of Appeals awarded the defendant a new trial when the trial court erred by failing [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 24: McCall, Council, and Wright</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/11/06/episode-24-mccall-council-and-wright/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-24-mccall-council-and-wright</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 18:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1040</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by North Carolina appellate courts on August 20 and 22, 2025. In State v. McCall, COA24-779 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 20, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that the State may use evidence of the defendant’s pre-arrest silence as substantive evidence [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by North Carolina appellate courts on August 20 and 22, 2025. In State v. McCall, COA24-779 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 20, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that the State may use evidence of the def]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by North Carolina appellate courts on August 20 and 22, 2025. In State v. McCall, COA24-779 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 20, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that the State may use evidence of the defendant’s pre-arrest silence as substantive evidence [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1040/episode-24-mccall-council-and-wright.mp3" length="46173098" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by North Carolina appellate courts on August 20 and 22, 2025. In State v. McCall, COA24-779 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 20, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that the State may use evidence of the defendant’s pre-arrest silence as substantive evidence [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>32:03</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by North Carolina appellate courts on August 20 and 22, 2025. In State v. McCall, COA24-779 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 20, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that the State may use evidence of the defendant’s pre-arrest silence as substantive evidence [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 23:  Jenkins, Jones, &#038; Wright</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/10/14/episode-23-jenkins-jones-wright/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-23-jenkins-jones-wright</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 19:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1034</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on August 6, 2025. In State v. Jenkins, No. COA24-889 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 6, 2025), the Court of Appeals construed the some-other-provision-of-law clause of G.S. 14-34.10 to preclude sentencing a defendant on [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on August 6, 2025. In State v. Jenkins, No. COA24-889 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 6, 2025), the Court of Appeals construed the some-other-provision-of-law claus]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on August 6, 2025. In State v. Jenkins, No. COA24-889 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 6, 2025), the Court of Appeals construed the some-other-provision-of-law clause of G.S. 14-34.10 to preclude sentencing a defendant on [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1034/episode-23-jenkins-jones-wright.mp3" length="41772544" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on August 6, 2025. In State v. Jenkins, No. COA24-889 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 6, 2025), the Court of Appeals construed the some-other-provision-of-law clause of G.S. 14-34.10 to preclude sentencing a defendant on [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>28:59</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on August 6, 2025. In State v. Jenkins, No. COA24-889 (N.C. Ct. App. Aug. 6, 2025), the Court of Appeals construed the some-other-provision-of-law clause of G.S. 14-34.10 to preclude sentencing a defendant on [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 22: Upchurch, Venable, and Moore</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/09/24/episode-22-upchurch-venable-and-moore/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-22-upchurch-venable-and-moore</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 16:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1031</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on July 2 and July 16, 2025. In State v. Upchurch, No. COA24-460 (N.C. Ct. App. July 2, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s motion [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on July 2 and July 16, 2025. In State v. Upchurch, No. COA24-460 (N.C. Ct. App. July 2, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on July 2 and July 16, 2025. In State v. Upchurch, No. COA24-460 (N.C. Ct. App. July 2, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s motion [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1031/episode-22-upchurch-venable-and-moore.mp3" length="50677590" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on July 2 and July 16, 2025. In State v. Upchurch, No. COA24-460 (N.C. Ct. App. July 2, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s motion [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>35:11</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on July 2 and July 16, 2025. In State v. Upchurch, No. COA24-460 (N.C. Ct. App. July 2, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no error in the denial of the defendant’s motion [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 21: Gilbert, Tadlock, and Wingate</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/09/04/episode-21-gilbert-tadlock-and-wingate/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-21-gilbert-tadlock-and-wingate</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 14:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1025</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on July 2, 2025. In State v. Gilbert, No. COA25-32 (N.C. Ct. App. July 2, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that it was improper for the prosecutor during closing argument to refer [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on July 2, 2025. In State v. Gilbert, No. COA25-32 (N.C. Ct. App. July 2, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that it was improper for the prosecutor durin]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on July 2, 2025. In State v. Gilbert, No. COA25-32 (N.C. Ct. App. July 2, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that it was improper for the prosecutor during closing argument to refer [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1025/episode-21-gilbert-tadlock-and-wingate.mp3" length="51205550" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on July 2, 2025. In State v. Gilbert, No. COA25-32 (N.C. Ct. App. July 2, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that it was improper for the prosecutor during closing argument to refer [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>35:33</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on July 2, 2025. In State v. Gilbert, No. COA25-32 (N.C. Ct. App. July 2, 2025), the Court of Appeals held that it was improper for the prosecutor during closing argument to refer [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 21: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/08/25/episode-21-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-21-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 15:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1018</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent cases from the North Carolina Court of Appeals and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on criminal contempt, drug recognition expert testimony, cannabis, and search and seizure.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers recent cases from the North Carolina Court of Appeals and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on criminal contempt, drug recognition expert testimony, cannabis, and search and seizure.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers recent cases from the North Carolina Court of Appeals and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on criminal contempt, drug recognition expert testimony, cannabis, and search and seizure.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1018/episode-21-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="65362715" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers recent cases from the North Carolina Court of Appeals and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on criminal contempt, drug recognition expert testimony, cannabis, and search and seizure.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>45:22</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent cases from the North Carolina Court of Appeals and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals on criminal contempt, drug recognition expert testimony, cannabis, and search and seizure.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 20: Tate and Gault</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/08/19/episode-20-tate-and-gault/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-20-tate-and-gault</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1013</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 18, 2025. In State v. Tate, COA24-450 (N.C. Ct. App. June 18, 2025), the Court of Appeals rejected the defendant’s Confrontation Clause challenge to the trial court’s admission of DNA results absent an opportunity [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 18, 2025. In State v. Tate, COA24-450 (N.C. Ct. App. June 18, 2025), the Court of Appeals rejected the defendant’s Confrontation Clause challenge ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 18, 2025. In State v. Tate, COA24-450 (N.C. Ct. App. June 18, 2025), the Court of Appeals rejected the defendant’s Confrontation Clause challenge to the trial court’s admission of DNA results absent an opportunity [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1013/episode-20-tate-and-gault.mp3" length="40078554" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 18, 2025. In State v. Tate, COA24-450 (N.C. Ct. App. June 18, 2025), the Court of Appeals rejected the defendant’s Confrontation Clause challenge to the trial court’s admission of DNA results absent an opportunity [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>27:49</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 18, 2025. In State v. Tate, COA24-450 (N.C. Ct. App. June 18, 2025), the Court of Appeals rejected the defendant’s Confrontation Clause challenge to the trial court’s admission of DNA results absent an opportunity [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 19: Arrington, Gardner, and Owens</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/08/04/episode-19-arrington-gardner-and-owens/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-19-arrington-gardner-and-owens</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 15:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1007</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 4, 2025. In State v. Arrington, COA24-688 (N.C. Ct. App. June 4, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no impropriety when the prosecutor told the jury that a State’s witness was [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 4, 2025. In State v. Arrington, COA24-688 (N.C. Ct. App. June 4, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no impropriety when the prosecutor told the j]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 4, 2025. In State v. Arrington, COA24-688 (N.C. Ct. App. June 4, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no impropriety when the prosecutor told the jury that a State’s witness was [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1007/episode-19-arrington-gardner-and-owens.mp3" length="45016860" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 4, 2025. In State v. Arrington, COA24-688 (N.C. Ct. App. June 4, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no impropriety when the prosecutor told the jury that a State’s witness was [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>31:15</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 4, 2025. In State v. Arrington, COA24-688 (N.C. Ct. App. June 4, 2025), the Court of Appeals found no impropriety when the prosecutor told the jury that a State’s witness was [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 20: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/07/25/episode-20-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-20-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 20:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=1000</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers new state legislation affecting criminal law, including the new crime of exposing a child to a controlled substance and a new cap on the time in which state post-conviction relief can be sought, as well as a recent Confrontation Clause case from the North Carolina Court of [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers new state legislation affecting criminal law, including the new crime of exposing a child to a controlled substance and a new cap on the time in which state post-conviction relief can be sought, as well as a recent Confrontation Claus]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers new state legislation affecting criminal law, including the new crime of exposing a child to a controlled substance and a new cap on the time in which state post-conviction relief can be sought, as well as a recent Confrontation Clause case from the North Carolina Court of [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/1000/episode-20-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="65474545" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers new state legislation affecting criminal law, including the new crime of exposing a child to a controlled substance and a new cap on the time in which state post-conviction relief can be sought, as well as a recent Confrontation Clause case from the North Carolina Court of [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>45:27</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers new state legislation affecting criminal law, including the new crime of exposing a child to a controlled substance and a new cap on the time in which state post-conviction relief can be sought, as well as a recent Confrontation Clause case from the North Carolina Court of [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 18: Chambers, Bowman, and Joyner</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/07/10/episode-18-chambers-bowman-and-joyner/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-18-chambers-bowman-and-joyner</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2025 14:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=995</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Appellate Courts in May 2025. In State v. Chambers, No. 56PA24 (N.C. May 23, 2025), the Supreme Court held that substitution of a juror after deliberations have begun (per G.S. 15A-1215(a)) does not violate a defendant’s [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Appellate Courts in May 2025. In State v. Chambers, No. 56PA24 (N.C. May 23, 2025), the Supreme Court held that substitution of a juror after deliberations have begun (p]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Appellate Courts in May 2025. In State v. Chambers, No. 56PA24 (N.C. May 23, 2025), the Supreme Court held that substitution of a juror after deliberations have begun (per G.S. 15A-1215(a)) does not violate a defendant’s [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/995/episode-18-chambers-bowman-and-joyner.mp3" length="48445391" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Appellate Courts in May 2025. In State v. Chambers, No. 56PA24 (N.C. May 23, 2025), the Supreme Court held that substitution of a juror after deliberations have begun (per G.S. 15A-1215(a)) does not violate a defendant’s [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>33:38</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Appellate Courts in May 2025. In State v. Chambers, No. 56PA24 (N.C. May 23, 2025), the Supreme Court held that substitution of a juror after deliberations have begun (per G.S. 15A-1215(a)) does not violate a defendant’s [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 17: Meadows, Ducker, and Townsend</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/06/24/episode-17-meadows-ducker-and-townsend/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-17-meadows-ducker-and-townsend</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 14:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=989</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals in May 2025. In State v. Meadows, COA24-149 (N.C. Ct. App. May 7, 2025), the Court of Appeals awarded a new trial where defense counsel impliedly admitted the defendant’s guilt to the jury [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals in May 2025. In State v. Meadows, COA24-149 (N.C. Ct. App. May 7, 2025), the Court of Appeals awarded a new trial where defense counsel impliedly admitt]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals in May 2025. In State v. Meadows, COA24-149 (N.C. Ct. App. May 7, 2025), the Court of Appeals awarded a new trial where defense counsel impliedly admitted the defendant’s guilt to the jury [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/989/episode-17-meadows-ducker-and-townsend.mp3" length="50650234" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals in May 2025. In State v. Meadows, COA24-149 (N.C. Ct. App. May 7, 2025), the Court of Appeals awarded a new trial where defense counsel impliedly admitted the defendant’s guilt to the jury [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>35:10</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals in May 2025. In State v. Meadows, COA24-149 (N.C. Ct. App. May 7, 2025), the Court of Appeals awarded a new trial where defense counsel impliedly admitted the defendant’s guilt to the jury [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 19: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/06/24/episode-19-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-19-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 13:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=983</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent developments in North Carolina regarding juror substitutions during deliberations, self-defense law, and constitutional challenges to NC’s firearm by felon law, as well as the recent en banc decision by the Fourth Circuit on geofencing warrants and more.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers recent developments in North Carolina regarding juror substitutions during deliberations, self-defense law, and constitutional challenges to NC’s firearm by felon law, as well as the recent en banc decision by the Fourth Circuit on ge]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers recent developments in North Carolina regarding juror substitutions during deliberations, self-defense law, and constitutional challenges to NC’s firearm by felon law, as well as the recent en banc decision by the Fourth Circuit on geofencing warrants and more.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/983/episode-19-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="74163591" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers recent developments in North Carolina regarding juror substitutions during deliberations, self-defense law, and constitutional challenges to NC’s firearm by felon law, as well as the recent en banc decision by the Fourth Circuit on geofencing warrants and more.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>51:29</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent developments in North Carolina regarding juror substitutions during deliberations, self-defense law, and constitutional challenges to NC’s firearm by felon law, as well as the recent en banc decision by the Fourth Circuit on geofencing warrants and more.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 16: Peters, Watlington, and Bryant</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/06/12/episode-16-peters-watlington-and-bryant/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-16-peters-watlington-and-bryant</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=977</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on April 16, 2025. In State v. Peters, COA24-475, the Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court’s findings on the defendant’s motion to suppress did not resolve the question of whether the defendant [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on April 16, 2025. In State v. Peters, COA24-475, the Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court’s findings on the defendant’s motion to suppress d]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on April 16, 2025. In State v. Peters, COA24-475, the Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court’s findings on the defendant’s motion to suppress did not resolve the question of whether the defendant [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/977/episode-16-peters-watlington-and-bryant.mp3" length="47889062" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on April 16, 2025. In State v. Peters, COA24-475, the Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court’s findings on the defendant’s motion to suppress did not resolve the question of whether the defendant [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>33:15</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on April 16, 2025. In State v. Peters, COA24-475, the Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court’s findings on the defendant’s motion to suppress did not resolve the question of whether the defendant [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 15: Fenner, Capps, and Ervin</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/05/29/episode-15-fenner-capps-and-ervin/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-15-fenner-capps-and-ervin</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 15:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=971</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Appellate Courts in March and April 2025. In State v. Fenner, 289PA23 (N.C. Mar. 21, 2025), the North Carolina Supreme Court held that the trial court complied with the colloquy required by G.S. 15A-1242 despite a [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Appellate Courts in March and April 2025. In State v. Fenner, 289PA23 (N.C. Mar. 21, 2025), the North Carolina Supreme Court held that the trial court complied with the ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Appellate Courts in March and April 2025. In State v. Fenner, 289PA23 (N.C. Mar. 21, 2025), the North Carolina Supreme Court held that the trial court complied with the colloquy required by G.S. 15A-1242 despite a [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/971/episode-15-fenner-capps-and-ervin.mp3" length="49721404" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Appellate Courts in March and April 2025. In State v. Fenner, 289PA23 (N.C. Mar. 21, 2025), the North Carolina Supreme Court held that the trial court complied with the colloquy required by G.S. 15A-1242 despite a [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>34:31</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Appellate Courts in March and April 2025. In State v. Fenner, 289PA23 (N.C. Mar. 21, 2025), the North Carolina Supreme Court held that the trial court complied with the colloquy required by G.S. 15A-1242 despite a [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 14: Windseth, Fuller, and McGirt</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/05/12/episode-14-windseth-fuller-and-mcgirt/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-14-windseth-fuller-and-mcgirt</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 17:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=966</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on March 19, 2025. In State v. Windseth, COA24-718, the Court of Appeals found that still images from an ATM surveillance video were properly authenticated as a business record. In State v. Fuller, [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on March 19, 2025. In State v. Windseth, COA24-718, the Court of Appeals found that still images from an ATM surveillance video were properly authentica]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on March 19, 2025. In State v. Windseth, COA24-718, the Court of Appeals found that still images from an ATM surveillance video were properly authenticated as a business record. In State v. Fuller, [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/966/episode-14-windseth-fuller-and-mcgirt.mp3" length="54156200" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on March 19, 2025. In State v. Windseth, COA24-718, the Court of Appeals found that still images from an ATM surveillance video were properly authenticated as a business record. In State v. Fuller, [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>37:36</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on March 19, 2025. In State v. Windseth, COA24-718, the Court of Appeals found that still images from an ATM surveillance video were properly authenticated as a business record. In State v. Fuller, [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 13: Fearns and Ruffin</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/04/24/episode-13-fearns-and-ruffin/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-13-fearns-and-ruffin</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=961</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on March 5, 2025. In State v. Fearns, COA23-650, the Court of Appeals held that, when the defendant’s pretrial motion to dismiss was heard by one judge, who rendered a ruling from the bench [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on March 5, 2025. In State v. Fearns, COA23-650, the Court of Appeals held that, when the defendant’s pretrial motion to dismiss was heard by one judge, w]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on March 5, 2025. In State v. Fearns, COA23-650, the Court of Appeals held that, when the defendant’s pretrial motion to dismiss was heard by one judge, who rendered a ruling from the bench [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/961/episode-13-fearns-and-ruffin.mp3" length="45293288" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on March 5, 2025. In State v. Fearns, COA23-650, the Court of Appeals held that, when the defendant’s pretrial motion to dismiss was heard by one judge, who rendered a ruling from the bench [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>31:26</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on March 5, 2025. In State v. Fearns, COA23-650, the Court of Appeals held that, when the defendant’s pretrial motion to dismiss was heard by one judge, who rendered a ruling from the bench [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 12: Nanes, Greenfield, and Velasco</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/04/07/episode-12-nanes-greenfield-and-velasco/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-12-nanes-greenfield-and-velasco</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 18:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=955</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on February 19, 2025. In State v. Nanes, COA24-487, the Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of G.S. 14-415.1, criminalizing possession of a firearm by a felon. In State v. Greenfield, COA23-597, the [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on February 19, 2025. In State v. Nanes, COA24-487, the Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of G.S. 14-415.1, criminalizing possession of a fi]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on February 19, 2025. In State v. Nanes, COA24-487, the Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of G.S. 14-415.1, criminalizing possession of a firearm by a felon. In State v. Greenfield, COA23-597, the [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/955/episode-12-nanes-greenfield-and-velasco.mp3" length="51636948" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on February 19, 2025. In State v. Nanes, COA24-487, the Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of G.S. 14-415.1, criminalizing possession of a firearm by a felon. In State v. Greenfield, COA23-597, the [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>35:51</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on February 19, 2025. In State v. Nanes, COA24-487, the Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of G.S. 14-415.1, criminalizing possession of a firearm by a felon. In State v. Greenfield, COA23-597, the [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 11: Lester, Boyd, and Spry</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/03/24/episode-11-lester-boyd-and-spry/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-11-lester-boyd-and-spry</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 13:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=950</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina appellate courts in January and February 2025. In State v. Lester, 293PA23-2, the North Carolina Supreme Court held the Confrontation Clause is not violated by the introduction of machine generated raw data, particularly call detail records. [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina appellate courts in January and February 2025. In State v. Lester, 293PA23-2, the North Carolina Supreme Court held the Confrontation Clause is not violated by the intro]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina appellate courts in January and February 2025. In State v. Lester, 293PA23-2, the North Carolina Supreme Court held the Confrontation Clause is not violated by the introduction of machine generated raw data, particularly call detail records. [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/950/episode-11-lester-boyd-and-spry.mp3" length="48667926" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina appellate courts in January and February 2025. In State v. Lester, 293PA23-2, the North Carolina Supreme Court held the Confrontation Clause is not violated by the introduction of machine generated raw data, particularly call detail records. [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>33:47</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina appellate courts in January and February 2025. In State v. Lester, 293PA23-2, the North Carolina Supreme Court held the Confrontation Clause is not violated by the introduction of machine generated raw data, particularly call detail records. [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 18: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/03/20/episode-18-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-18-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 15:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=943</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on cannabis, Second Amendment challenges, units of prosecution, and sentencing issues. ]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on cannabis, Second Amendment challenges, units of prosecution, and sentencing issues. ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on cannabis, Second Amendment challenges, units of prosecution, and sentencing issues. ]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/943/episode-18-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="90252510" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on cannabis, Second Amendment challenges, units of prosecution, and sentencing issues. ]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:02:39</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on cannabis, Second Amendment challenges, units of prosecution, and sentencing issues. ]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 10: Hicks, Davenport, and Lacure</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/03/10/episode-10-hicks-davenport-and-lacure/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-10-hicks-davenport-and-lacure</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=939</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases about digital evidence decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 31, 2024, and January 15, 2025. In State v. Hicks, COA20-665-2, the Court of Appeals held the defendant was entitled to a new trial based on the erroneous [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases about digital evidence decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 31, 2024, and January 15, 2025. In State v. Hicks, COA20-665-2, the Court of Appeals held the defendant was entitled ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases about digital evidence decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 31, 2024, and January 15, 2025. In State v. Hicks, COA20-665-2, the Court of Appeals held the defendant was entitled to a new trial based on the erroneous [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/939/episode-10-hicks-davenport-and-lacure.mp3" length="47357036" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases about digital evidence decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 31, 2024, and January 15, 2025. In State v. Hicks, COA20-665-2, the Court of Appeals held the defendant was entitled to a new trial based on the erroneous [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>32:53</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases about digital evidence decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 31, 2024, and January 15, 2025. In State v. Hicks, COA20-665-2, the Court of Appeals held the defendant was entitled to a new trial based on the erroneous [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 9: Wilson, Farook, and Williams</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/02/26/episode-9-wilson-farook-and-williams/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-9-wilson-farook-and-williams</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=934</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 31, 2024. In State v. Wilson, COA23-1031, the Court of Appeals awarded the defendant a new trial where the trial court instructed the jury on the theory of kidnapping that was not alleged [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 31, 2024. In State v. Wilson, COA23-1031, the Court of Appeals awarded the defendant a new trial where the trial court instructed the jury o]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 31, 2024. In State v. Wilson, COA23-1031, the Court of Appeals awarded the defendant a new trial where the trial court instructed the jury on the theory of kidnapping that was not alleged [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/934/episode-9-wilson-farook-and-williams.mp3" length="48077696" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 31, 2024. In State v. Wilson, COA23-1031, the Court of Appeals awarded the defendant a new trial where the trial court instructed the jury on the theory of kidnapping that was not alleged [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>33:23</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 31, 2024. In State v. Wilson, COA23-1031, the Court of Appeals awarded the defendant a new trial where the trial court instructed the jury on the theory of kidnapping that was not alleged [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 17: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/02/25/episode-17-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-17-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=930</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent Second Amendment developments, cases addressing challenges to prejudicial and irrelevant evidence, and a North Carolina Supreme Court decision on the Confrontation Clause.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers recent Second Amendment developments, cases addressing challenges to prejudicial and irrelevant evidence, and a North Carolina Supreme Court decision on the Confrontation Clause.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers recent Second Amendment developments, cases addressing challenges to prejudicial and irrelevant evidence, and a North Carolina Supreme Court decision on the Confrontation Clause.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/930/episode-17-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="79468148" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers recent Second Amendment developments, cases addressing challenges to prejudicial and irrelevant evidence, and a North Carolina Supreme Court decision on the Confrontation Clause.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>55:10</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent Second Amendment developments, cases addressing challenges to prejudicial and irrelevant evidence, and a North Carolina Supreme Court decision on the Confrontation Clause.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 8: Reel, Carwile, and Stollings</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/02/10/episode-8-reel-carwile-and-stollings/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-8-reel-carwile-and-stollings</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=925</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 17, 2024. In State v. Reel, COA23-711, the Court of Appeals rejected the defendant’s challenge to a warrantless search of his home based on exigent circumstances. In State v. Carwile, COA23-885, [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 17, 2024. In State v. Reel, COA23-711, the Court of Appeals rejected the defendant’s challenge to a warrantless search of his home based on ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 17, 2024. In State v. Reel, COA23-711, the Court of Appeals rejected the defendant’s challenge to a warrantless search of his home based on exigent circumstances. In State v. Carwile, COA23-885, [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/925/episode-8-reel-carwile-and-stollings.mp3" length="54209302" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 17, 2024. In State v. Reel, COA23-711, the Court of Appeals rejected the defendant’s challenge to a warrantless search of his home based on exigent circumstances. In State v. Carwile, COA23-885, [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>37:38</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 17, 2024. In State v. Reel, COA23-711, the Court of Appeals rejected the defendant’s challenge to a warrantless search of his home based on exigent circumstances. In State v. Carwile, COA23-885, [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 16: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/01/23/episode-16-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-16-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 20:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=920</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent case law developments on plain feel doctrine, probable cause, and pill bottles, constructive possession, failure to store firearms to protect minors, and THC-O.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers recent case law developments on plain feel doctrine, probable cause, and pill bottles, constructive possession, failure to store firearms to protect minors, and THC-O.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers recent case law developments on plain feel doctrine, probable cause, and pill bottles, constructive possession, failure to store firearms to protect minors, and THC-O.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/920/episode-16-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="72349045" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers recent case law developments on plain feel doctrine, probable cause, and pill bottles, constructive possession, failure to store firearms to protect minors, and THC-O.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>50:13</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent case law developments on plain feel doctrine, probable cause, and pill bottles, constructive possession, failure to store firearms to protect minors, and THC-O.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 7: Clark, Vaughn, and Garmon</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/01/21/episode-7-clark-vaughn-and-garmon/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-7-clark-vaughn-and-garmon</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 15:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=917</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 3, 2024. In State v. Clark, COA23-1133, the Court of Appeals applied Smith v. Arizona, 602 U.S. 779 (2024), and concluded the trial court erred by admitting the testimony of a [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 3, 2024. In State v. Clark, COA23-1133, the Court of Appeals applied Smith v. Arizona, 602 U.S. 779 (2024), and concluded the trial court er]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 3, 2024. In State v. Clark, COA23-1133, the Court of Appeals applied Smith v. Arizona, 602 U.S. 779 (2024), and concluded the trial court erred by admitting the testimony of a [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/917/episode-7-clark-vaughn-and-garmon.mp3" length="45789420" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 3, 2024. In State v. Clark, COA23-1133, the Court of Appeals applied Smith v. Arizona, 602 U.S. 779 (2024), and concluded the trial court erred by admitting the testimony of a [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>31:47</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on December 3, 2024. In State v. Clark, COA23-1133, the Court of Appeals applied Smith v. Arizona, 602 U.S. 779 (2024), and concluded the trial court erred by admitting the testimony of a [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 6: Lancaster, Myers, and Teel</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2025/01/08/episode-6-lancaster-myers-and-teel/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-6-lancaster-myers-and-teel</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 16:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=909</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[***Language Warning*** In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 19, 2024. In State v. Lancaster, COA24-152, the Court of Appeals found no error in the trial court’s holding the defendant in criminal contempt&#160;twice&#160;for swearing at the judge (the [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[***Language Warning*** In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 19, 2024. In State v. Lancaster, COA24-152, the Court of Appeals found no error in the trial court’s holding the defe]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[***Language Warning*** In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 19, 2024. In State v. Lancaster, COA24-152, the Court of Appeals found no error in the trial court’s holding the defendant in criminal contempt&#160;twice&#160;for swearing at the judge (the [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/909/episode-6-lancaster-myers-and-teel.mp3" length="47013506" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[***Language Warning*** In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 19, 2024. In State v. Lancaster, COA24-152, the Court of Appeals found no error in the trial court’s holding the defendant in criminal contempt&#160;twice&#160;for swearing at the judge (the [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>32:38</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[***Language Warning*** In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on November 19, 2024. In State v. Lancaster, COA24-152, the Court of Appeals found no error in the trial court’s holding the defendant in criminal contempt&#160;twice&#160;for swearing at the judge (the [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 5: Burris, Graves, and Little</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/12/24/episode-5-burris-graves-and-little/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-5-burris-graves-and-little</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=905</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina appellate courts in October and November 2024. In State v. Burris, 198A23, the North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed an opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals that found no error in the denial of the [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina appellate courts in October and November 2024. In State v. Burris, 198A23, the North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed an opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals th]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina appellate courts in October and November 2024. In State v. Burris, 198A23, the North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed an opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals that found no error in the denial of the [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/905/episode-5-burris-graves-and-little.mp3" length="48677656" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina appellate courts in October and November 2024. In State v. Burris, 198A23, the North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed an opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals that found no error in the denial of the [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>33:48</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina appellate courts in October and November 2024. In State v. Burris, 198A23, the North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed an opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals that found no error in the denial of the [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 15: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/12/12/episode-15-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-15-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=900</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers the new state crime of sexual extortion, amendments to our state exploitation and disclose of private images offenses, a cannabis update, geofencing warrants, and more.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers the new state crime of sexual extortion, amendments to our state exploitation and disclose of private images offenses, a cannabis update, geofencing warrants, and more.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers the new state crime of sexual extortion, amendments to our state exploitation and disclose of private images offenses, a cannabis update, geofencing warrants, and more.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/900/episode-15-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="68589323" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers the new state crime of sexual extortion, amendments to our state exploitation and disclose of private images offenses, a cannabis update, geofencing warrants, and more.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>47:37</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers the new state crime of sexual extortion, amendments to our state exploitation and disclose of private images offenses, a cannabis update, geofencing warrants, and more.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 4: Ellison, Hunt, and Moore</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/12/03/episode-4-ellison-hunt-and-moore/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-4-ellison-hunt-and-moore</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=894</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on October 15, 2024. In State v. Ellison, COA24-30, the Court of Appeals upheld a search warrant despite the inclusion of photographs depicting the wrong address. In State v. Hunt, COA23-890, the Court [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on October 15, 2024. In State v. Ellison, COA24-30, the Court of Appeals upheld a search warrant despite the inclusion of photographs depicting the wron]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on October 15, 2024. In State v. Ellison, COA24-30, the Court of Appeals upheld a search warrant despite the inclusion of photographs depicting the wrong address. In State v. Hunt, COA23-890, the Court [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/894/episode-4-ellison-hunt-and-moore.mp3" length="50032494" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on October 15, 2024. In State v. Ellison, COA24-30, the Court of Appeals upheld a search warrant despite the inclusion of photographs depicting the wrong address. In State v. Hunt, COA23-890, the Court [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>34:44</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on October 15, 2024. In State v. Ellison, COA24-30, the Court of Appeals upheld a search warrant despite the inclusion of photographs depicting the wrong address. In State v. Hunt, COA23-890, the Court [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 14: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/11/14/episode-14-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-14-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 22:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=889</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent Second Amendment developments from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court decision on substitute analysts, Smith v. Arizona.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers recent Second Amendment developments from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court decision on substitute analysts, Smith v. Arizona.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers recent Second Amendment developments from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court decision on substitute analysts, Smith v. Arizona.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/889/episode-14-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="59425965" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers recent Second Amendment developments from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court decision on substitute analysts, Smith v. Arizona.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>41:15</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent Second Amendment developments from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Fourth Circuit, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court decision on substitute analysts, Smith v. Arizona.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 3: Jackson, Reber, and Shiene</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/11/14/episode-3-jackson-reber-and-shiene/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-3-jackson-reber-and-shiene</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 21:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=882</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on October 1, 2024, all of them involving issues of search and seizure. In State v. Jackson, COA23-637, the Court of Appeals concluded the defendant’s consent to search his car was not involuntary [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on October 1, 2024, all of them involving issues of search and seizure. In State v. Jackson, COA23-637, the Court of Appeals concluded the defendant’s c]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on October 1, 2024, all of them involving issues of search and seizure. In State v. Jackson, COA23-637, the Court of Appeals concluded the defendant’s consent to search his car was not involuntary [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/882/episode-3-jackson-reber-and-shiene.mp3" length="45163167" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on October 1, 2024, all of them involving issues of search and seizure. In State v. Jackson, COA23-637, the Court of Appeals concluded the defendant’s consent to search his car was not involuntary [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>31:21</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on October 1, 2024, all of them involving issues of search and seizure. In State v. Jackson, COA23-637, the Court of Appeals concluded the defendant’s consent to search his car was not involuntary [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 2: Evans and Wilkins</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/10/31/evans-and-wilkins/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=evans-and-wilkins</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=877</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 17, 2024. In&#160;State v. Evans, COA23-1160, the Court of Appeals addressed the defendant’s challenge to the State’s evidence of larceny by an employee, concluding there was sufficient evidence of an intent [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 17, 2024. In&#160;State v. Evans, COA23-1160, the Court of Appeals addressed the defendant’s challenge to the State’s evidence of larceny by ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 17, 2024. In&#160;State v. Evans, COA23-1160, the Court of Appeals addressed the defendant’s challenge to the State’s evidence of larceny by an employee, concluding there was sufficient evidence of an intent [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/877/evans-and-wilkins.mp3" length="39611184" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 17, 2024. In&#160;State v. Evans, COA23-1160, the Court of Appeals addressed the defendant’s challenge to the State’s evidence of larceny by an employee, concluding there was sufficient evidence of an intent [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>27:30</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss two cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 17, 2024. In&#160;State v. Evans, COA23-1160, the Court of Appeals addressed the defendant’s challenge to the State’s evidence of larceny by an employee, concluding there was sufficient evidence of an intent [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 1: Little, Pierce, and Thomas</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/10/16/little-pierce-and-thomas/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=little-pierce-and-thomas</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 17:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=873</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode,&#160;Hyde&#160;and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 3, 2024. In State v.&#160;Little, COA23-410, the Court of Appeals held the odor and smell&#160;of marijuana alone provide probable cause for a search. In State v. Pierce, No COA23-348, the Court of Appeals [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode,&#160;Hyde&#160;and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 3, 2024. In State v.&#160;Little, COA23-410, the Court of Appeals held the odor and smell&#160;of marijuana alone provide probabl]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode,&#160;Hyde&#160;and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 3, 2024. In State v.&#160;Little, COA23-410, the Court of Appeals held the odor and smell&#160;of marijuana alone provide probable cause for a search. In State v. Pierce, No COA23-348, the Court of Appeals [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/873/little-pierce-and-thomas.mp3" length="51062260" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode,&#160;Hyde&#160;and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 3, 2024. In State v.&#160;Little, COA23-410, the Court of Appeals held the odor and smell&#160;of marijuana alone provide probable cause for a search. In State v. Pierce, No COA23-348, the Court of Appeals [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>35:27</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode,&#160;Hyde&#160;and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on September 3, 2024. In State v.&#160;Little, COA23-410, the Court of Appeals held the odor and smell&#160;of marijuana alone provide probable cause for a search. In State v. Pierce, No COA23-348, the Court of Appeals [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/20240120-Turning-States-podcast-graphic4a-Large.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 13: North Carolina Benchmarking Project: Helping Elected Officials Make Better Decisions</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/08/29/elected-ed-season-1-episode-13-north-carolina-benchmarking-project-helping-elected-officials-make-better-decisions/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elected-ed-season-1-episode-13-north-carolina-benchmarking-project-helping-elected-officials-make-better-decisions</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 18:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=864</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This podcast explores how the North Carolina Benchmarking Project is enabling data and decisions in municipalities. The Benchmarking Project allows elected leaders and managers to compare service data and performance trends with other participating units. ]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This podcast explores how the North Carolina Benchmarking Project is enabling data and decisions in municipalities. The Benchmarking Project allows elected leaders and managers to compare service data and performance trends with other participating units]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This podcast explores how the North Carolina Benchmarking Project is enabling data and decisions in municipalities. The Benchmarking Project allows elected leaders and managers to compare service data and performance trends with other participating units. ]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/864/elected-ed-season-1-episode-13-north-carolina-benchmarking-project-helping-elected-officials-make-better-decisions.mp3" length="38218899" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This podcast explores how the North Carolina Benchmarking Project is enabling data and decisions in municipalities. The Benchmarking Project allows elected leaders and managers to compare service data and performance trends with other participating units. ]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>26:32</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This podcast explores how the North Carolina Benchmarking Project is enabling data and decisions in municipalities. The Benchmarking Project allows elected leaders and managers to compare service data and performance trends with other participating units. ]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 13: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/06/20/episode-13-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-13-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 19:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=857</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers the first successful Second Amendment challenge to a North Carolina criminal law, evidentiary challenges with marijuana prosecutions, and preservation of motions to suppress.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers the first successful Second Amendment challenge to a North Carolina criminal law, evidentiary challenges with marijuana prosecutions, and preservation of motions to suppress.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers the first successful Second Amendment challenge to a North Carolina criminal law, evidentiary challenges with marijuana prosecutions, and preservation of motions to suppress.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/857/episode-13-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="78531999" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers the first successful Second Amendment challenge to a North Carolina criminal law, evidentiary challenges with marijuana prosecutions, and preservation of motions to suppress.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>54:31</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers the first successful Second Amendment challenge to a North Carolina criminal law, evidentiary challenges with marijuana prosecutions, and preservation of motions to suppress.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 12: Between Parents and Minors: Health Care, Oh My!</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/05/08/elected-ed-season-1-episode-12-between-parents-and-minors-health-care-oh-my/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elected-ed-season-1-episode-12-between-parents-and-minors-health-care-oh-my</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 13:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=852</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[2023 legislation enacted by the NC General Assembly created a “Parents’ Bill of Rights”. Local public officials who are responsible for health care services for minors are affected by the legislation, although some parts of the bill simply codify language from already-existing laws. Learn what’s new and what’s not new [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[2023 legislation enacted by the NC General Assembly created a “Parents’ Bill of Rights”. Local public officials who are responsible for health care services for minors are affected by the legislation, although some parts of the bill simply codify languag]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[2023 legislation enacted by the NC General Assembly created a “Parents’ Bill of Rights”. Local public officials who are responsible for health care services for minors are affected by the legislation, although some parts of the bill simply codify language from already-existing laws. Learn what’s new and what’s not new [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/852/elected-ed-season-1-episode-12-between-parents-and-minors-health-care-oh-my.mp3" length="29728745" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[2023 legislation enacted by the NC General Assembly created a “Parents’ Bill of Rights”. Local public officials who are responsible for health care services for minors are affected by the legislation, although some parts of the bill simply codify language from already-existing laws. Learn what’s new and what’s not new [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>20:38</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[2023 legislation enacted by the NC General Assembly created a “Parents’ Bill of Rights”. Local public officials who are responsible for health care services for minors are affected by the legislation, although some parts of the bill simply codify language from already-existing laws. Learn what’s new and what’s not new [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 12: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/04/19/episode-12-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-12-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 13:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=841</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent legislation, including the expansion of the public defender system in the state and felony pleas in district court, along with cases on search and seizure in the age of legal hemp, the Confrontation Clause, plea bargaining, and sentencing.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent legislation, including the expansion of the public defender system in the state and felony pleas in district court, along with cases on search and seizure in the age of legal hemp, the Confrontation Clause, plea bargaining, ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent legislation, including the expansion of the public defender system in the state and felony pleas in district court, along with cases on search and seizure in the age of legal hemp, the Confrontation Clause, plea bargaining, and sentencing.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/841/episode-12-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="78050635" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent legislation, including the expansion of the public defender system in the state and felony pleas in district court, along with cases on search and seizure in the age of legal hemp, the Confrontation Clause, plea bargaining, and sentencing.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>54:11</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent legislation, including the expansion of the public defender system in the state and felony pleas in district court, along with cases on search and seizure in the age of legal hemp, the Confrontation Clause, plea bargaining, and sentencing.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 11: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/04/10/episode-11-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-11-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=836</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode highlights recent state search and seizure cases, new state criminal law legislation, prayers for judgment continued (“PJCs”), and more.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode highlights recent state search and seizure cases, new state criminal law legislation, prayers for judgment continued (“PJCs”), and more.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode highlights recent state search and seizure cases, new state criminal law legislation, prayers for judgment continued (“PJCs”), and more.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/836/episode-11-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="85691447" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode highlights recent state search and seizure cases, new state criminal law legislation, prayers for judgment continued (“PJCs”), and more.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>59:30</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode highlights recent state search and seizure cases, new state criminal law legislation, prayers for judgment continued (“PJCs”), and more.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 11: Pregnant with a Substance Use Disorder: Cabarrus County Treatment Collaboration</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/03/14/elected-ed-season-1-episode-11-pregnant-with-a-substance-use-disorder-cabarrus-county-treatment-collaboration/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elected-ed-season-1-episode-11-pregnant-with-a-substance-use-disorder-cabarrus-county-treatment-collaboration</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=827</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Pregnant women with substance use disorders face challenges in finding obstetrical care. The SUN project in Cabarrus County is a collaborative approach to cross-sector pre-natal care that treats the mother, the newborn, and the family with a comprehensive array of services steeped in compassion.&#160;&#160;]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Pregnant women with substance use disorders face challenges in finding obstetrical care. The SUN project in Cabarrus County is a collaborative approach to cross-sector pre-natal care that treats the mother, the newborn, and the family with a comprehensiv]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Pregnant women with substance use disorders face challenges in finding obstetrical care. The SUN project in Cabarrus County is a collaborative approach to cross-sector pre-natal care that treats the mother, the newborn, and the family with a comprehensive array of services steeped in compassion.&#160;&#160;]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/827/elected-ed-season-1-episode-11-pregnant-with-a-substance-use-disorder-cabarrus-county-treatment-collaboration.mp3" length="49797425" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Pregnant women with substance use disorders face challenges in finding obstetrical care. The SUN project in Cabarrus County is a collaborative approach to cross-sector pre-natal care that treats the mother, the newborn, and the family with a comprehensive array of services steeped in compassion.&#160;&#160;]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>34:34</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Pregnant women with substance use disorders face challenges in finding obstetrical care. The SUN project in Cabarrus County is a collaborative approach to cross-sector pre-natal care that treats the mother, the newborn, and the family with a comprehensive array of services steeped in compassion.&#160;&#160;]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 10: Connect to Protect: Guilford Agencies Collaborate to Prevent Elder Abuse</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2024/03/01/elected-ed-season-1-episode-10-connect-to-protect-guilford-agencies-collaborate-to-prevent-elder-abuse/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elected-ed-season-1-episode-10-connect-to-protect-guilford-agencies-collaborate-to-prevent-elder-abuse</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 16:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=848</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Public officials across Guilford County decided Elder Abuse was not acceptable. A multi-disciplinary team made up of law enforcement officers, judicial officials, and agencies that work with elderly populations, is breaking down silos between agencies through a shared mission: to protect older adults from abuse and stop the perpetrators.&#160;]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Public officials across Guilford County decided Elder Abuse was not acceptable. A multi-disciplinary team made up of law enforcement officers, judicial officials, and agencies that work with elderly populations, is breaking down silos between agencies th]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Public officials across Guilford County decided Elder Abuse was not acceptable. A multi-disciplinary team made up of law enforcement officers, judicial officials, and agencies that work with elderly populations, is breaking down silos between agencies through a shared mission: to protect older adults from abuse and stop the perpetrators.&#160;]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/848/elected-ed-season-1-episode-10-connect-to-protect-guilford-agencies-collaborate-to-prevent-elder-abuse.mp3" length="39267819" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Public officials across Guilford County decided Elder Abuse was not acceptable. A multi-disciplinary team made up of law enforcement officers, judicial officials, and agencies that work with elderly populations, is breaking down silos between agencies through a shared mission: to protect older adults from abuse and stop the perpetrators.&#160;]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>27:16</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Public officials across Guilford County decided Elder Abuse was not acceptable. A multi-disciplinary team made up of law enforcement officers, judicial officials, and agencies that work with elderly populations, is breaking down silos between agencies through a shared mission: to protect older adults from abuse and stop the perpetrators.&#160;]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 10: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/11/15/episode-10-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-10-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 20:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=822</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers the U.S. Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. Diaz-Tomas regarding dismissal with leave, the Court’s grant of review in the substitute analyst case of Smith v. Arizona, the North Carolina Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Arthur on drug identification, and recent legislation in the [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers the U.S. Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. Diaz-Tomas regarding dismissal with leave, the Court’s grant of review in the substitute analyst case of Smith v. Arizona, the North Carolina Supreme Court’s decision in State v. A]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers the U.S. Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. Diaz-Tomas regarding dismissal with leave, the Court’s grant of review in the substitute analyst case of Smith v. Arizona, the North Carolina Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Arthur on drug identification, and recent legislation in the [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/822/episode-10-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="86983097" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers the U.S. Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. Diaz-Tomas regarding dismissal with leave, the Court’s grant of review in the substitute analyst case of Smith v. Arizona, the North Carolina Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Arthur on drug identification, and recent legislation in the [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:00:23</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers the U.S. Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. Diaz-Tomas regarding dismissal with leave, the Court’s grant of review in the substitute analyst case of Smith v. Arizona, the North Carolina Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Arthur on drug identification, and recent legislation in the [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 9: Growing Old in North Carolina? Who Cares?</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/10/25/elected-ed-season-1-episode-9-growing-old-in-north-carolina-who-cares/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elected-ed-season-1-episode-9-growing-old-in-north-carolina-who-cares</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 18:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=819</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Growing old is hard. For most of us, we whine and complain about our ailments and then move on to the next topic of the day. That’s not reality for many older adults. In this podcast, we explore the School of Government’s Adult Protection Network, and how elected officials can [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Growing old is hard. For most of us, we whine and complain about our ailments and then move on to the next topic of the day. That’s not reality for many older adults. In this podcast, we explore the School of Government’s Adult Protection Network, and ho]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Growing old is hard. For most of us, we whine and complain about our ailments and then move on to the next topic of the day. That’s not reality for many older adults. In this podcast, we explore the School of Government’s Adult Protection Network, and how elected officials can [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/819/elected-ed-season-1-episode-9-growing-old-in-north-carolina-who-cares.mp3" length="38553688" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Growing old is hard. For most of us, we whine and complain about our ailments and then move on to the next topic of the day. That’s not reality for many older adults. In this podcast, we explore the School of Government’s Adult Protection Network, and how elected officials can [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>26:46</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Growing old is hard. For most of us, we whine and complain about our ailments and then move on to the next topic of the day. That’s not reality for many older adults. In this podcast, we explore the School of Government’s Adult Protection Network, and how elected officials can [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 8: What is Workplace Culture? Should Elected Officials Care?</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/08/09/elected-ed-season-1-episode-8-what-is-workplace-culture-should-elected-officials-care/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elected-ed-season-1-episode-8-what-is-workplace-culture-should-elected-officials-care</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=805</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[How does workplace culture affect worker recruitment and retention? This topic was identified by our faculty as one of five issues to watch in 2023. We talk about what workplace culture means in the public sector and why it should matter to local governing boards.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[How does workplace culture affect worker recruitment and retention? This topic was identified by our faculty as one of five issues to watch in 2023. We talk about what workplace culture means in the public sector and why it should matter to local governi]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[How does workplace culture affect worker recruitment and retention? This topic was identified by our faculty as one of five issues to watch in 2023. We talk about what workplace culture means in the public sector and why it should matter to local governing boards.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/805/elected-ed-season-1-episode-8-what-is-workplace-culture-should-elected-officials-care.mp3" length="28215855" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[How does workplace culture affect worker recruitment and retention? This topic was identified by our faculty as one of five issues to watch in 2023. We talk about what workplace culture means in the public sector and why it should matter to local governing boards.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>19:35</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[How does workplace culture affect worker recruitment and retention? This topic was identified by our faculty as one of five issues to watch in 2023. We talk about what workplace culture means in the public sector and why it should matter to local governing boards.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 7: What derails an elected official?</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/07/12/elected-ed-season-1-episode-7-what-derails-an-elected-official/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elected-ed-season-1-episode-7-what-derails-an-elected-official</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 19:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=802</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[North Carolina elected officials described what it means to get derailed – what it looks like and what happens as a result. SOG faculty member Willow Jacobson and her colleagues discuss what we learned: who really suffers when a local elected official gets derailed?]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[North Carolina elected officials described what it means to get derailed – what it looks like and what happens as a result. SOG faculty member Willow Jacobson and her colleagues discuss what we learned: who really suffers when a local elected official ge]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[North Carolina elected officials described what it means to get derailed – what it looks like and what happens as a result. SOG faculty member Willow Jacobson and her colleagues discuss what we learned: who really suffers when a local elected official gets derailed?]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/802/elected-ed-season-1-episode-7-what-derails-an-elected-official.mp3" length="28100689" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[North Carolina elected officials described what it means to get derailed – what it looks like and what happens as a result. SOG faculty member Willow Jacobson and her colleagues discuss what we learned: who really suffers when a local elected official gets derailed?]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>19:30</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[North Carolina elected officials described what it means to get derailed – what it looks like and what happens as a result. SOG faculty member Willow Jacobson and her colleagues discuss what we learned: who really suffers when a local elected official gets derailed?]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 9: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/06/22/episode-9-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-9-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 15:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=794</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent legislation, including changes to satellite-based monitoring and a new offense of misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, as well as recent state cases on constructive possession, Harbison error, and expert testimony.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent legislation, including changes to satellite-based monitoring and a new offense of misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, as well as recent state cases on constructive possession, Harbison error, and expert testimony.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent legislation, including changes to satellite-based monitoring and a new offense of misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, as well as recent state cases on constructive possession, Harbison error, and expert testimony.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/794/episode-9-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="51526895" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent legislation, including changes to satellite-based monitoring and a new offense of misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, as well as recent state cases on constructive possession, Harbison error, and expert testimony.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>35:46</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent legislation, including changes to satellite-based monitoring and a new offense of misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, as well as recent state cases on constructive possession, Harbison error, and expert testimony.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 8: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/06/15/episode-8-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-8-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 18:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=788</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode discusses the filings at the U.S. Supreme Court in State v. Diaz-Tomas, monetary obligations in criminal cases, recent state legislation, as well as cases on courtroom closures and capacity to proceed.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode discusses the filings at the U.S. Supreme Court in State v. Diaz-Tomas, monetary obligations in criminal cases, recent state legislation, as well as cases on courtroom closures and capacity to proceed.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode discusses the filings at the U.S. Supreme Court in State v. Diaz-Tomas, monetary obligations in criminal cases, recent state legislation, as well as cases on courtroom closures and capacity to proceed.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/788/episode-8-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="71326030" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode discusses the filings at the U.S. Supreme Court in State v. Diaz-Tomas, monetary obligations in criminal cases, recent state legislation, as well as cases on courtroom closures and capacity to proceed.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-podcast-graphic_300x300.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>49:31</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode discusses the filings at the U.S. Supreme Court in State v. Diaz-Tomas, monetary obligations in criminal cases, recent state legislation, as well as cases on courtroom closures and capacity to proceed.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-podcast-graphic_300x300.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 6: My House is worth WHAT?!</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/06/08/elected-ed-season-1-episode-6-my-house-is-worth-what/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elected-ed-season-1-episode-6-my-house-is-worth-what</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2023 14:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=780</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Whether you own your home or rent it, the value of it affects how much you pay for it. The process for determining the true value of taxable property is called “appraisal”. Local elected officials are responsible for assuring that it’s accurate, fair, and equitable. How does that work?]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Whether you own your home or rent it, the value of it affects how much you pay for it. The process for determining the true value of taxable property is called “appraisal”. Local elected officials are responsible for assuring that it’s accurate, fair, an]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Whether you own your home or rent it, the value of it affects how much you pay for it. The process for determining the true value of taxable property is called “appraisal”. Local elected officials are responsible for assuring that it’s accurate, fair, and equitable. How does that work?]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/780/elected-ed-season-1-episode-6-my-house-is-worth-what.mp3" length="29132424" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Whether you own your home or rent it, the value of it affects how much you pay for it. The process for determining the true value of taxable property is called “appraisal”. Local elected officials are responsible for assuring that it’s accurate, fair, and equitable. How does that work?]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>20:13</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Whether you own your home or rent it, the value of it affects how much you pay for it. The process for determining the true value of taxable property is called “appraisal”. Local elected officials are responsible for assuring that it’s accurate, fair, and equitable. How does that work?]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 5: Elected Officials Learn Whether Property Reappraisals are Equitable</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/05/10/elected-ed-season-1-episode-5-elected-officials-learn-whether-property-reappraisals-are-equitable/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elected-ed-season-1-episode-5-elected-officials-learn-whether-property-reappraisals-are-equitable</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 11:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=775</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Elected officials want economically vibrant communities and gentrification is affecting property values in many urban areas. Learn how changing housing markets can lead to equity issues in property appraisals and appeals.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Elected officials want economically vibrant communities and gentrification is affecting property values in many urban areas. Learn how changing housing markets can lead to equity issues in property appraisals and appeals.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Elected officials want economically vibrant communities and gentrification is affecting property values in many urban areas. Learn how changing housing markets can lead to equity issues in property appraisals and appeals.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/775/elected-ed-season-1-episode-5-elected-officials-learn-whether-property-reappraisals-are-equitable.mp3" length="34705583" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Elected officials want economically vibrant communities and gentrification is affecting property values in many urban areas. Learn how changing housing markets can lead to equity issues in property appraisals and appeals.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>24:06</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Elected officials want economically vibrant communities and gentrification is affecting property values in many urban areas. Learn how changing housing markets can lead to equity issues in property appraisals and appeals.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 4: Elected Officials Face Challenges in Hiring and Keeping Local Public Health Worker</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/04/12/elected-ed-season-1-episode-4-elected-officials-face-challenges-in-hiring-and-keeping-local-public-health-worker/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elected-ed-season-1-episode-4-elected-officials-face-challenges-in-hiring-and-keeping-local-public-health-worker</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=769</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode explores recent findings of the NC Institute of Medicine’s Task Force on the Future of the Public Health Workforce in NC.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode explores recent findings of the NC Institute of Medicine’s Task Force on the Future of the Public Health Workforce in NC.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode explores recent findings of the NC Institute of Medicine’s Task Force on the Future of the Public Health Workforce in NC.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/769/elected-ed-season-1-episode-4-elected-officials-face-challenges-in-hiring-and-keeping-local-public-health-worker.mp3" length="46166370" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode explores recent findings of the NC Institute of Medicine’s Task Force on the Future of the Public Health Workforce in NC.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>32:03</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode explores recent findings of the NC Institute of Medicine’s Task Force on the Future of the Public Health Workforce in NC.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 3: Shedding Light for Elected Leaders: Sex Trafficking Can Look Normal to the Uninformed</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/03/08/elected-ed-season-1-episode-3-shedding-light-for-elected-leaders-sex-trafficking-can-look-normal-to-the-uninformed/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elected-ed-season-1-episode-3-shedding-light-for-elected-leaders-sex-trafficking-can-look-normal-to-the-uninformed</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2023 13:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=761</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In the final episode of our series about sex and labor trafficking, a survivor of familial trafficking shares her story of abuse, resilience, and success.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In the final episode of our series about sex and labor trafficking, a survivor of familial trafficking shares her story of abuse, resilience, and success.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In the final episode of our series about sex and labor trafficking, a survivor of familial trafficking shares her story of abuse, resilience, and success.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/761/elected-ed-season-1-episode-3-shedding-light-for-elected-leaders-sex-trafficking-can-look-normal-to-the-uninformed.mp3" length="40952807" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the final episode of our series about sex and labor trafficking, a survivor of familial trafficking shares her story of abuse, resilience, and success.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>28:26</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In the final episode of our series about sex and labor trafficking, a survivor of familial trafficking shares her story of abuse, resilience, and success.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 7: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/03/03/episode-7-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-7-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 15:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=757</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers the latest in criminal law, including artificial intelligence and the law, harm reduction laws, khat, the constitutionality of disorderly conducts laws, live-streaming the police, the exclusionary rule at probation, and more.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers the latest in criminal law, including artificial intelligence and the law, harm reduction laws, khat, the constitutionality of disorderly conducts laws, live-streaming the police, the exclusionary rule at probation, and more.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers the latest in criminal law, including artificial intelligence and the law, harm reduction laws, khat, the constitutionality of disorderly conducts laws, live-streaming the police, the exclusionary rule at probation, and more.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/757/episode-7-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="66831099" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers the latest in criminal law, including artificial intelligence and the law, harm reduction laws, khat, the constitutionality of disorderly conducts laws, live-streaming the police, the exclusionary rule at probation, and more.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>46:24</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers the latest in criminal law, including artificial intelligence and the law, harm reduction laws, khat, the constitutionality of disorderly conducts laws, live-streaming the police, the exclusionary rule at probation, and more.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 2: Elected Officials Learn Trafficking Indicators and the Importance of Staff Training</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/02/22/elected-ed-season-1-episode-2-elected-officials-learn-trafficking-indicators-and-the-importance-of-staff-training/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=elected-ed-season-1-episode-2-elected-officials-learn-trafficking-indicators-and-the-importance-of-staff-training</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=754</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[We encounter the survivors of human trafficking without realizing it.  This episode is the second of three in a series about sex and labor trafficking.  In it, we hear from a local government elected official who was trafficked as a teenager and learn about the factors that enabled her resilience.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[We encounter the survivors of human trafficking without realizing it.  This episode is the second of three in a series about sex and labor trafficking.  In it, we hear from a local government elected official who was trafficked as a teenager and learn ab]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[We encounter the survivors of human trafficking without realizing it.  This episode is the second of three in a series about sex and labor trafficking.  In it, we hear from a local government elected official who was trafficked as a teenager and learn about the factors that enabled her resilience.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/754/elected-ed-season-1-episode-2-elected-officials-learn-trafficking-indicators-and-the-importance-of-staff-training.mp3" length="27928472" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[We encounter the survivors of human trafficking without realizing it.  This episode is the second of three in a series about sex and labor trafficking.  In it, we hear from a local government elected official who was trafficked as a teenager and learn about the factors that enabled her resilience.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>19:23</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[We encounter the survivors of human trafficking without realizing it.  This episode is the second of three in a series about sex and labor trafficking.  In it, we hear from a local government elected official who was trafficked as a teenager and learn about the factors that enabled her resilience.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Elected Ed: Season 1, Episode 1: Local Elected Officials Can Help Stop Human Trafficking</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2023/02/03/season-1-episode-1-elected-ed/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=season-1-episode-1-elected-ed</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 17:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=724</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[When it comes to human trafficking, elected officials might think “that doesn’t happen here.” In this podcast, the UNC School of Government’s expert in human trafficking, Margaret Henderson, talks about her recently-published bulletin on one specific form of human trafficking, familial sex trafficking, which does in fact exist here in [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[When it comes to human trafficking, elected officials might think “that doesn’t happen here.” In this podcast, the UNC School of Government’s expert in human trafficking, Margaret Henderson, talks about her recently-published bulletin on one specific for]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[When it comes to human trafficking, elected officials might think “that doesn’t happen here.” In this podcast, the UNC School of Government’s expert in human trafficking, Margaret Henderson, talks about her recently-published bulletin on one specific form of human trafficking, familial sex trafficking, which does in fact exist here in [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/724/season-1-episode-1-elected-ed.mp3" length="255348" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[When it comes to human trafficking, elected officials might think “that doesn’t happen here.” In this podcast, the UNC School of Government’s expert in human trafficking, Margaret Henderson, talks about her recently-published bulletin on one specific form of human trafficking, familial sex trafficking, which does in fact exist here in [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>23:22</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[When it comes to human trafficking, elected officials might think “that doesn’t happen here.” In this podcast, the UNC School of Government’s expert in human trafficking, Margaret Henderson, talks about her recently-published bulletin on one specific form of human trafficking, familial sex trafficking, which does in fact exist here in [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Elected-Ed-Logo2.0.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 6: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2022/11/28/episode-6-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-6-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 17:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=691</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent state and national criminal law news, along with recent criminal decisions from the NC Supreme Court and the NC Court of Appeals. Topics include 911 call analysis, forfeiture of counsel, obstruction of justice, reinstatement of charges dismissed with leave, and cannabis.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers recent state and national criminal law news, along with recent criminal decisions from the NC Supreme Court and the NC Court of Appeals. Topics include 911 call analysis, forfeiture of counsel, obstruction of justice, reinstatement of]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers recent state and national criminal law news, along with recent criminal decisions from the NC Supreme Court and the NC Court of Appeals. Topics include 911 call analysis, forfeiture of counsel, obstruction of justice, reinstatement of charges dismissed with leave, and cannabis.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/691/episode-6-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="63572895" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers recent state and national criminal law news, along with recent criminal decisions from the NC Supreme Court and the NC Court of Appeals. Topics include 911 call analysis, forfeiture of counsel, obstruction of justice, reinstatement of charges dismissed with leave, and cannabis.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>44:08</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers recent state and national criminal law news, along with recent criminal decisions from the NC Supreme Court and the NC Court of Appeals. Topics include 911 call analysis, forfeiture of counsel, obstruction of justice, reinstatement of charges dismissed with leave, and cannabis.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 5: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2022/10/31/episode-5-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-5-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=683</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode covers the latest in federal and state criminal law news, recent Fourth Amendment cases from the Fourth Circuit, new developments in cannabis and drug identification in the state, new state cases on identity theft and going armed to the terror of the public, as well as a review [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode covers the latest in federal and state criminal law news, recent Fourth Amendment cases from the Fourth Circuit, new developments in cannabis and drug identification in the state, new state cases on identity theft and going armed to the terr]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode covers the latest in federal and state criminal law news, recent Fourth Amendment cases from the Fourth Circuit, new developments in cannabis and drug identification in the state, new state cases on identity theft and going armed to the terror of the public, as well as a review [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/683/episode-5-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="89483766" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode covers the latest in federal and state criminal law news, recent Fourth Amendment cases from the Fourth Circuit, new developments in cannabis and drug identification in the state, new state cases on identity theft and going armed to the terror of the public, as well as a review [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:02:08</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode covers the latest in federal and state criminal law news, recent Fourth Amendment cases from the Fourth Circuit, new developments in cannabis and drug identification in the state, new state cases on identity theft and going armed to the terror of the public, as well as a review [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 4: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2022/09/27/episode-4-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-4-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=678</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent criminal law news, along with a review of recent decisions by the North Carolina appellate division. Topics include the recent raid by the FBI of Mar-a-Lago, the trial penalty, and confrontation rights at trial and probation violation hearings.&#160;]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent criminal law news, along with a review of recent decisions by the North Carolina appellate division. Topics include the recent raid by the FBI of Mar-a-Lago, the trial penalty, and confrontation rights at trial and probation]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent criminal law news, along with a review of recent decisions by the North Carolina appellate division. Topics include the recent raid by the FBI of Mar-a-Lago, the trial penalty, and confrontation rights at trial and probation violation hearings.&#160;]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/678/episode-4-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="56258124" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent criminal law news, along with a review of recent decisions by the North Carolina appellate division. Topics include the recent raid by the FBI of Mar-a-Lago, the trial penalty, and confrontation rights at trial and probation violation hearings.&#160;]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>39:04</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode discusses recent criminal law news, along with a review of recent decisions by the North Carolina appellate division. Topics include the recent raid by the FBI of Mar-a-Lago, the trial penalty, and confrontation rights at trial and probation violation hearings.&#160;]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 3: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2022/08/04/episode-3-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-3-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=668</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/668/episode-3-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="39516858" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>27:26</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 2: NC Criminal Debrief</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2022/06/14/episode-2-nc-criminal-debrief/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-2-nc-criminal-debrief</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 13:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=659</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode is a review of recent state criminal cases. It covers search and seizure law, First Amendment issues in criminal law, post-conviction DNA testing, the right to counsel, substitute expert analyst testimony and the Confrontation Clause, along with the first successful Batson violation in the state.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode is a review of recent state criminal cases. It covers search and seizure law, First Amendment issues in criminal law, post-conviction DNA testing, the right to counsel, substitute expert analyst testimony and the Confrontation Clause, along ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode is a review of recent state criminal cases. It covers search and seizure law, First Amendment issues in criminal law, post-conviction DNA testing, the right to counsel, substitute expert analyst testimony and the Confrontation Clause, along with the first successful Batson violation in the state.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/659/episode-2-nc-criminal-debrief.mp3" length="93010984" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode is a review of recent state criminal cases. It covers search and seizure law, First Amendment issues in criminal law, post-conviction DNA testing, the right to counsel, substitute expert analyst testimony and the Confrontation Clause, along with the first successful Batson violation in the state.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:04:35</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode is a review of recent state criminal cases. It covers search and seizure law, First Amendment issues in criminal law, post-conviction DNA testing, the right to counsel, substitute expert analyst testimony and the Confrontation Clause, along with the first successful Batson violation in the state.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/NC-CriminalDebrief-Podcast-Graphic.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Episode 1: Inaugural NC Criminal Debrief Episode</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2022/05/03/episode-1-inaugural-nc-criminal-debrief-episode/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-1-inaugural-nc-criminal-debrief-episode</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 17:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=637</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Episode one of NC Criminal Debrief focuses on recent developments in North Carolina criminal law, including recent appellate decisions, new legislation, and a new rule of general practice.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Episode one of NC Criminal Debrief focuses on recent developments in North Carolina criminal law, including recent appellate decisions, new legislation, and a new rule of general practice.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Episode one of NC Criminal Debrief focuses on recent developments in North Carolina criminal law, including recent appellate decisions, new legislation, and a new rule of general practice.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/637/episode-1-inaugural-nc-criminal-debrief-episode.mp3" length="102858351" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Episode one of NC Criminal Debrief focuses on recent developments in North Carolina criminal law, including recent appellate decisions, new legislation, and a new rule of general practice.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:11:25</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Episode one of NC Criminal Debrief focuses on recent developments in North Carolina criminal law, including recent appellate decisions, new legislation, and a new rule of general practice.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Ep. 7: Understanding Property Revaluation</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2021/03/25/property-revaluation/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=property-revaluation</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=612</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Faculty member Kirk Boone describes the basics of property revaluation, what it means for various stakeholders, and the role and responsibilities of local elected leaders during the revaluation process.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Faculty member Kirk Boone describes the basics of property revaluation, what it means for various stakeholders, and the role and responsibilities of local elected leaders during the revaluation process.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[Understanding Property Revaluation]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Faculty member Kirk Boone describes the basics of property revaluation, what it means for various stakeholders, and the role and responsibilities of local elected leaders during the revaluation process.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/612/property-revaluation.mp3" length="36898176" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Faculty member Kirk Boone describes the basics of property revaluation, what it means for various stakeholders, and the role and responsibilities of local elected leaders during the revaluation process.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>19:11</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Faculty member Kirk Boone describes the basics of property revaluation, what it means for various stakeholders, and the role and responsibilities of local elected leaders during the revaluation process.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Ep. 6: What’s Your Form Of Government?</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2021/03/25/form-of-government/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=form-of-government</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=610</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Faculty Members Kim Nelson and Carl Stenberg summarize the various forms of local government in North Carolina. &#160;These include the prevailing Manager/Council and County Manager forms, and the Mayor/Council form used by some smaller municipal jurisdictions. &#160;Listeners will gain a clear understanding of each form, and&#160;of the distinct leadership roles [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Faculty Members Kim Nelson and Carl Stenberg summarize the various forms of local government in North Carolina. &#160;These include the prevailing Manager/Council and County Manager forms, and the Mayor/Council form used by some smaller municipal jurisdi]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[What’s Your Form Of Government?]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Faculty Members Kim Nelson and Carl Stenberg summarize the various forms of local government in North Carolina. &#160;These include the prevailing Manager/Council and County Manager forms, and the Mayor/Council form used by some smaller municipal jurisdictions. &#160;Listeners will gain a clear understanding of each form, and&#160;of the distinct leadership roles [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/610/form-of-government.mp3" length="19968119" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Faculty Members Kim Nelson and Carl Stenberg summarize the various forms of local government in North Carolina. &#160;These include the prevailing Manager/Council and County Manager forms, and the Mayor/Council form used by some smaller municipal jurisdictions. &#160;Listeners will gain a clear understanding of each form, and&#160;of the distinct leadership roles [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>20:48</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Faculty Members Kim Nelson and Carl Stenberg summarize the various forms of local government in North Carolina. &#160;These include the prevailing Manager/Council and County Manager forms, and the Mayor/Council form used by some smaller municipal jurisdictions. &#160;Listeners will gain a clear understanding of each form, and&#160;of the distinct leadership roles [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Ep. 7: Understanding Property Revaluation</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/property-revaluation/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=property-revaluation</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=608</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Faculty member Kirk Boone describes the basics of property revaluation, what it means for various stakeholders, and the role and responsibilities of local elected leaders during the revaluation process.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Faculty member Kirk Boone describes the basics of property revaluation, what it means for various stakeholders, and the role and responsibilities of local elected leaders during the revaluation process.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[Understanding Property Revaluation]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Faculty member Kirk Boone describes the basics of property revaluation, what it means for various stakeholders, and the role and responsibilities of local elected leaders during the revaluation process.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/608/property-revaluation.mp3" length="10748465" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Faculty member Kirk Boone describes the basics of property revaluation, what it means for various stakeholders, and the role and responsibilities of local elected leaders during the revaluation process.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>22:24</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Faculty member Kirk Boone describes the basics of property revaluation, what it means for various stakeholders, and the role and responsibilities of local elected leaders during the revaluation process.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Ep. 6: What’s Your Form of Government?</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/form-of-government/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=form-of-government</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=606</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Faculty Members Kim Nelson and Carl Stenberg summarize the various forms of local government in North Carolina. &#160;These include the prevailing Manager/Council and County Manager forms, and the Mayor/Council form used by some smaller municipal jurisdictions. &#160;Listeners will gain a clear understanding of each form, and&#160;of the distinct leadership roles [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Faculty Members Kim Nelson and Carl Stenberg summarize the various forms of local government in North Carolina. &#160;These include the prevailing Manager/Council and County Manager forms, and the Mayor/Council form used by some smaller municipal jurisdi]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[What’s Your Form Of Government?]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Faculty Members Kim Nelson and Carl Stenberg summarize the various forms of local government in North Carolina. &#160;These include the prevailing Manager/Council and County Manager forms, and the Mayor/Council form used by some smaller municipal jurisdictions. &#160;Listeners will gain a clear understanding of each form, and&#160;of the distinct leadership roles [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/606/form-of-government.mp3" length="19968119" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Faculty Members Kim Nelson and Carl Stenberg summarize the various forms of local government in North Carolina. &#160;These include the prevailing Manager/Council and County Manager forms, and the Mayor/Council form used by some smaller municipal jurisdictions. &#160;Listeners will gain a clear understanding of each form, and&#160;of the distinct leadership roles [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>20:48</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Faculty Members Kim Nelson and Carl Stenberg summarize the various forms of local government in North Carolina. &#160;These include the prevailing Manager/Council and County Manager forms, and the Mayor/Council form used by some smaller municipal jurisdictions. &#160;Listeners will gain a clear understanding of each form, and&#160;of the distinct leadership roles [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Ep. 5: The Lingo Of Mental Disabilities In NC</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2020/11/12/ep-5-the-lingo-of-mental-disabilities-in-nc/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ep-5-the-lingo-of-mental-disabilities-in-nc</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=601</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The words that describe the different kinds of mental disabilities can be confounding for laymen, and the terminology for the organizational structures are equally confusing.&#160; In this podcast Mark Botts, SOG faculty member who specializes in this field of law, helps make sense of the “alphabet soup” as he talks [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The words that describe the different kinds of mental disabilities can be confounding for laymen, and the terminology for the organizational structures are equally confusing.&#160; In this podcast Mark Botts, SOG faculty member who specializes in this fi]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The words that describe the different kinds of mental disabilities can be confounding for laymen, and the terminology for the organizational structures are equally confusing.&#160; In this podcast Mark Botts, SOG faculty member who specializes in this field of law, helps make sense of the “alphabet soup” as he talks [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/601/ep-5-the-lingo-of-mental-disabilities-in-nc.mp3" length="15485159" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The words that describe the different kinds of mental disabilities can be confounding for laymen, and the terminology for the organizational structures are equally confusing.&#160; In this podcast Mark Botts, SOG faculty member who specializes in this field of law, helps make sense of the “alphabet soup” as he talks [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>38:19</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The words that describe the different kinds of mental disabilities can be confounding for laymen, and the terminology for the organizational structures are equally confusing.&#160; In this podcast Mark Botts, SOG faculty member who specializes in this field of law, helps make sense of the “alphabet soup” as he talks [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Ep. 5: The Lingo of Mental Disabilities in NC</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/the-lingo-of-mental-disabilities-in-nc/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-lingo-of-mental-disabilities-in-nc</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=599</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The words that describe the different kinds of mental disabilities can be confounding for laymen, and the terminology for the organizational structures are equally confusing.&#160; In this podcast Mark Botts, SOG faculty member who specializes in this field of law, helps make sense of the “alphabet soup” as he talks [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The words that describe the different kinds of mental disabilities can be confounding for laymen, and the terminology for the organizational structures are equally confusing.&#160; In this podcast Mark Botts, SOG faculty member who specializes in this fi]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The words that describe the different kinds of mental disabilities can be confounding for laymen, and the terminology for the organizational structures are equally confusing.&#160; In this podcast Mark Botts, SOG faculty member who specializes in this field of law, helps make sense of the “alphabet soup” as he talks [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/599/the-lingo-of-mental-disabilities-in-nc.mp3" length="15485159" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The words that describe the different kinds of mental disabilities can be confounding for laymen, and the terminology for the organizational structures are equally confusing.&#160; In this podcast Mark Botts, SOG faculty member who specializes in this field of law, helps make sense of the “alphabet soup” as he talks [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>38:19</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The words that describe the different kinds of mental disabilities can be confounding for laymen, and the terminology for the organizational structures are equally confusing.&#160; In this podcast Mark Botts, SOG faculty member who specializes in this field of law, helps make sense of the “alphabet soup” as he talks [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>(Episode 3) “Beyond Icebreakers: How to Help Participants Really Connect”</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2020/06/15/networks-that-work-episode-3/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=networks-that-work-episode-3</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=552</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[On this episode we are featuring Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison. This program provides college education, life skills, and reentry support to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated men and women to help them make a positive impact on their own lives, their families, and communities. Program participation is associated [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[On this episode we are featuring Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison. This program provides college education, life skills, and reentry support to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated men and women to help them make a positive impact on their ow]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[(Episode 3) “Program Alumni as Assets in Building Social Capital”]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[On this episode we are featuring Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison. This program provides college education, life skills, and reentry support to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated men and women to help them make a positive impact on their own lives, their families, and communities. Program participation is associated [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/552/networks-that-work-episode-3.mp3" length="27677758" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[On this episode we are featuring Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison. This program provides college education, life skills, and reentry support to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated men and women to help them make a positive impact on their own lives, their families, and communities. Program participation is associated [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>22:41</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[On this episode we are featuring Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison. This program provides college education, life skills, and reentry support to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated men and women to help them make a positive impact on their own lives, their families, and communities. Program participation is associated [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>(Episode 2) “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital”</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2020/06/15/networks-that-work-episode-2/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=networks-that-work-episode-2</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=549</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital,” we feature Family Independence Initiative of Detroit. This program partners with families to improve education, housing, and transportation for its participants.  They use a unique technology application called UpTogether that allows participants to connect. For more information, visit http://aspe.hhs.gov/social-capital]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital,” we feature Family Independence Initiative of Detroit. This program partners with families to improve education, housing, and transportation for its participants.  They use a]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[(Episode 2) “Using Technology and Social Capital”]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital,” we feature Family Independence Initiative of Detroit. This program partners with families to improve education, housing, and transportation for its participants.  They use a unique technology application called UpTogether that allows participants to connect. For more information, visit http://aspe.hhs.gov/social-capital]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/549/networks-that-work-episode-2.mp3" length="73654888" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital,” we feature Family Independence Initiative of Detroit. This program partners with families to improve education, housing, and transportation for its participants.  They use a unique technology application called UpTogether that allows participants to connect. For more information, visit http://aspe.hhs.gov/social-capital]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>22:09</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital,” we feature Family Independence Initiative of Detroit. This program partners with families to improve education, housing, and transportation for its participants.  They use a unique technology application called UpTogether that allows participants to connect. For more information, visit http://aspe.hhs.gov/social-capital]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>(Episode 1) “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups”</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2020/06/15/networks-that-work-episode-1/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=networks-that-work-episode-1</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=546</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups,” we feature the Building Wealth and Health Network, a program designed to incentivize entrepreneurship and self-sufficiency in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.  It features opportunities for parents and care-givers of young children to increase their income and savings, [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups,” we feature the Building Wealth and Health Network, a program designed to incentivize entrepreneurship and self-sufficiency in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (T]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[(Episode 1) “Peer Groups and Social Capital”]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups,” we feature the Building Wealth and Health Network, a program designed to incentivize entrepreneurship and self-sufficiency in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.  It features opportunities for parents and care-givers of young children to increase their income and savings, [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/546/networks-that-work-episode-1.mp3" length="33413422" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups,” we feature the Building Wealth and Health Network, a program designed to incentivize entrepreneurship and self-sufficiency in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.  It features opportunities for parents and care-givers of young children to increase their income and savings, [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>25:53</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups,” we feature the Building Wealth and Health Network, a program designed to incentivize entrepreneurship and self-sufficiency in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.  It features opportunities for parents and care-givers of young children to increase their income and savings, [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>(Episode 3) “Beyond Icebreakers: How to Help Participants Really Connect”</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/networks-that-work-episode-3/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=networks-that-work-episode-3</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 22:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=542</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[On this episode we are featuring Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison. This program provides college education, life skills, and reentry support to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated men and women to help them make a positive impact on their own lives, their families and communities. This results in lower [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[On this episode we are featuring Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison. This program provides college education, life skills, and reentry support to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated men and women to help them make a positive impact on their ow]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[(Episode 3) “Program Alumni as Assets in Building Social Capital”]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[On this episode we are featuring Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison. This program provides college education, life skills, and reentry support to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated men and women to help them make a positive impact on their own lives, their families and communities. This results in lower [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/542/networks-that-work-episode-3.mp3" length="27677758" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[On this episode we are featuring Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison. This program provides college education, life skills, and reentry support to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated men and women to help them make a positive impact on their own lives, their families and communities. This results in lower [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>22:04</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[On this episode we are featuring Hudson Link for Higher Education in Prison. This program provides college education, life skills, and reentry support to incarcerated and formerly incarcerated men and women to help them make a positive impact on their own lives, their families and communities. This results in lower [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>(Episode 2) “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital”</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/networks-that-work-episode-2/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=networks-that-work-episode-2</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 22:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=540</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital,” we feature&#160;Family Independence Initiative of Detroit.&#160;This program partners with families to improve education, housing, and transportation for its participants.&#160; They use a unique technology application called UpTogether that allows participants to connect.&#160;For more information, visit&#160;http://aspe.hhs.gov/social-capital]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital,” we feature&#160;Family Independence Initiative of Detroit.&#160;This program partners with families to improve education, housing, and transportation for its participants.&#]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[(Episode 2) “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital”]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital,” we feature&#160;Family Independence Initiative of Detroit.&#160;This program partners with families to improve education, housing, and transportation for its participants.&#160; They use a unique technology application called UpTogether that allows participants to connect.&#160;For more information, visit&#160;http://aspe.hhs.gov/social-capital]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/540/networks-that-work-episode-2.mp3" length="73654888" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital,” we feature&#160;Family Independence Initiative of Detroit.&#160;This program partners with families to improve education, housing, and transportation for its participants.&#160; They use a unique technology application called UpTogether that allows participants to connect.&#160;For more information, visit&#160;http://aspe.hhs.gov/social-capital]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>22:09</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, “Friend Request Accepted: Using Technology and Social Capital,” we feature&#160;Family Independence Initiative of Detroit.&#160;This program partners with families to improve education, housing, and transportation for its participants.&#160; They use a unique technology application called UpTogether that allows participants to connect.&#160;For more information, visit&#160;http://aspe.hhs.gov/social-capital]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>(Episode 1) “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups”</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/networks-that-work-episode-1/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=networks-that-work-episode-1</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 21:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=538</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups,” we feature the&#160;Building Wealth and Health Network,&#160;a program designed to incentivize entrepreneurship and self-sufficiency in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.&#160; It features opportunities for parents and care-givers of young children to increase their income and savings, [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups,” we feature the&#160;Building Wealth and Health Network,&#160;a program designed to incentivize entrepreneurship and self-sufficiency in the Temporary Assistance for Needy F]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[(Episode 1) “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups”]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups,” we feature the&#160;Building Wealth and Health Network,&#160;a program designed to incentivize entrepreneurship and self-sufficiency in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.&#160; It features opportunities for parents and care-givers of young children to increase their income and savings, [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/538/networks-that-work-episode-1.mp3" length="33413422" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups,” we feature the&#160;Building Wealth and Health Network,&#160;a program designed to incentivize entrepreneurship and self-sufficiency in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.&#160; It features opportunities for parents and care-givers of young children to increase their income and savings, [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>25:53</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, “Close-Knit Communities for Better Outcomes: Using Peer Groups,” we feature the&#160;Building Wealth and Health Network,&#160;a program designed to incentivize entrepreneurship and self-sufficiency in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.&#160; It features opportunities for parents and care-givers of young children to increase their income and savings, [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Networks That Work Teaser</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/networks-that-work-teaser/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=networks-that-work-teaser</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 22:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=509</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Networks That Work is a podcast about the networks and relationships that make up Social Capital. Social capital is connections and networks you have with other people and the value you get from them to help you succeed in life. Your connections are a source of information emotional support and [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Networks That Work is a podcast about the networks and relationships that make up Social Capital. Social capital is connections and networks you have with other people and the value you get from them to help you succeed in life. Your connections are a so]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Networks That Work is a podcast about the networks and relationships that make up Social Capital. Social capital is connections and networks you have with other people and the value you get from them to help you succeed in life. Your connections are a source of information emotional support and [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/509/networks-that-work-teaser.mp3" length="3370548" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Networks That Work is a podcast about the networks and relationships that make up Social Capital. Social capital is connections and networks you have with other people and the value you get from them to help you succeed in life. Your connections are a source of information emotional support and [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/20200143-Networks-That-Work-5-02.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>2:20</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Networks That Work is a podcast about the networks and relationships that make up Social Capital. Social capital is connections and networks you have with other people and the value you get from them to help you succeed in life. Your connections are a source of information emotional support and [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/20200143-Networks-That-Work-5-02.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>A Day in The Life Episode 4: Thriving Workplaces</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2019/10/16/a-day-in-the-life-episode-4-thriving-workplaces/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-day-in-the-life-episode-4-thriving-workplaces</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 13:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=480</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Leisha DeHart Davis discusses effective workplace routines and strategies that keeps employees engaged and motivated.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Leisha DeHart Davis discusses effective workplace routines and strategies that keeps employees engaged and motivated.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Leisha DeHart Davis discusses effective workplace routines and strategies that keeps employees engaged and motivated.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/480/a-day-in-the-life-episode-4-thriving-workplaces.mp3" length="37378176" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Leisha DeHart Davis discusses effective workplace routines and strategies that keeps employees engaged and motivated.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>19:26</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Leisha DeHart Davis discusses effective workplace routines and strategies that keeps employees engaged and motivated.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Ep. 4: Thriving Workplaces</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/ep-4-thriving-workplaces/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ep-4-thriving-workplaces</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 14:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=395</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Leisha DeHart Davis discusses effective workplace routines and strategies that keeps employees engaged and motivated.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Leisha DeHart Davis discusses effective workplace routines and strategies that keeps employees engaged and motivated.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[Ep. 4: Thriving Workplaces]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Leisha DeHart Davis discusses effective workplace routines and strategies that keeps employees engaged and motivated.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/395/ep-4-thriving-workplaces.mp3" length="37378176" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Leisha DeHart Davis discusses effective workplace routines and strategies that keeps employees engaged and motivated.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>19:26</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Leisha DeHart Davis discusses effective workplace routines and strategies that keeps employees engaged and motivated.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>A Day in the Life: No such thing as a free lunch</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2019/08/19/a-day-in-the-life-frayda-bluestein-and-norma-houston-on-gifts-favors-and-ethics/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-day-in-the-life-frayda-bluestein-and-norma-houston-on-gifts-favors-and-ethics</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=388</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, faculty members Frayda Bluestein and Norma Houston discuss the legal and ethical issues that govern when officials should avoid accepting gifts and favors and explain what the law says on the issue.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, faculty members Frayda Bluestein and Norma Houston discuss the legal and ethical issues that govern when officials should avoid accepting gifts and favors and explain what the law says on the issue.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, faculty members Frayda Bluestein and Norma Houston discuss the legal and ethical issues that govern when officials should avoid accepting gifts and favors and explain what the law says on the issue.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/388/a-day-in-the-life-frayda-bluestein-and-norma-houston-on-gifts-favors-and-ethics.mp3" length="15885696" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, faculty members Frayda Bluestein and Norma Houston discuss the legal and ethical issues that govern when officials should avoid accepting gifts and favors and explain what the law says on the issue.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>8:14</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, faculty members Frayda Bluestein and Norma Houston discuss the legal and ethical issues that govern when officials should avoid accepting gifts and favors and explain what the law says on the issue.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>A Day in the Life: Solving Wicked Problems</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2019/08/19/a-day-in-the-life-margaret-henderson-on-problem-solving-in-public-management/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-day-in-the-life-margaret-henderson-on-problem-solving-in-public-management</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 17:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=385</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Margaret Henderson provides strategies for local elected officials to deal with intransigent, cross-cutting problems where no one entity is in charge.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Margaret Henderson provides strategies for local elected officials to deal with intransigent, cross-cutting problems where no one entity is in charge.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Margaret Henderson provides strategies for local elected officials to deal with intransigent, cross-cutting problems where no one entity is in charge.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/385/a-day-in-the-life-margaret-henderson-on-problem-solving-in-public-management.mp3" length="12240768" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Margaret Henderson provides strategies for local elected officials to deal with intransigent, cross-cutting problems where no one entity is in charge.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>6:20</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Margaret Henderson provides strategies for local elected officials to deal with intransigent, cross-cutting problems where no one entity is in charge.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Ep 2:  A Day in the Life: Solving Wicked Problems</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/a-day-in-the-life-margaret-henderson-on-problem-solving-in-public-management/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-day-in-the-life-margaret-henderson-on-problem-solving-in-public-management</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 16:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=380</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Margaret Henderson provides strategies for local elected officials to deal with intransigent, cross-cutting problems where no one entity is in charge.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Margaret Henderson provides strategies for local elected officials to deal with intransigent, cross-cutting problems where no one entity is in charge.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[Ep. 2: Solving Wicked Problems]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Margaret Henderson provides strategies for local elected officials to deal with intransigent, cross-cutting problems where no one entity is in charge.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/380/a-day-in-the-life-margaret-henderson-on-problem-solving-in-public-management.mp3" length="12240768" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Margaret Henderson provides strategies for local elected officials to deal with intransigent, cross-cutting problems where no one entity is in charge.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>6:20</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Margaret Henderson provides strategies for local elected officials to deal with intransigent, cross-cutting problems where no one entity is in charge.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>A Day in the Life: John Stevens on Conflict Management</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2019/08/19/a-day-in-the-life-john-stevens-on-conflict-management/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-day-in-the-life-john-stevens-on-conflict-management</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 16:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=381</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/381/a-day-in-the-life-john-stevens-on-conflict-management.mp3" length="35217792" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>18:19</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Ep 3:  A Day in the Life: No such thing as a free lunch</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/frayda-bluestein-and-norma-houston-on-gifts-favors-and-ethics/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=frayda-bluestein-and-norma-houston-on-gifts-favors-and-ethics</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 16:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=378</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Frayda Bluestein and Norma Houston discuss the legal and ethical issues that govern when officials should avoid accepting gifts and favors and explain what the law says on the issue.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Frayda Bluestein and Norma Houston discuss the legal and ethical issues that govern when officials should avoid accepting gifts and favors and explain what the law says on the issue.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[Ep. 3: No such thing as a free lunch]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Frayda Bluestein and Norma Houston discuss the legal and ethical issues that govern when officials should avoid accepting gifts and favors and explain what the law says on the issue.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/378/frayda-bluestein-and-norma-houston-on-gifts-favors-and-ethics.mp3" length="15885696" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Frayda Bluestein and Norma Houston discuss the legal and ethical issues that govern when officials should avoid accepting gifts and favors and explain what the law says on the issue.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>8:14</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, Frayda Bluestein and Norma Houston discuss the legal and ethical issues that govern when officials should avoid accepting gifts and favors and explain what the law says on the issue.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>A Day in the Life: Managing Conflict</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2019/07/08/a-day-in-the-life-managing-conflict/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-day-in-the-life-managing-conflict</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=374</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode is about how conflicts arise daily in elected office and there are respectful ways to manage it.&#160;The podcast also includes tips from Yadkin County Commissioner Kevin Austin and Morrisville Town Council Member Liz Johnson.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode is about how conflicts arise daily in elected office and there are respectful ways to manage it.&#160;The podcast also includes tips from Yadkin County Commissioner Kevin Austin and Morrisville Town Council Member Liz Johnson.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode is about how conflicts arise daily in elected office and there are respectful ways to manage it.&#160;The podcast also includes tips from Yadkin County Commissioner Kevin Austin and Morrisville Town Council Member Liz Johnson.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/374/a-day-in-the-life-managing-conflict.mp3" length="35217792" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode is about how conflicts arise daily in elected office and there are respectful ways to manage it.&#160;The podcast also includes tips from Yadkin County Commissioner Kevin Austin and Morrisville Town Council Member Liz Johnson.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ADayInTheLife__iTunes.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>18:19</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode is about how conflicts arise daily in elected office and there are respectful ways to manage it.&#160;The podcast also includes tips from Yadkin County Commissioner Kevin Austin and Morrisville Town Council Member Liz Johnson.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ADayInTheLife__iTunes.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Ep 1: A Day in the Life: Managing Conflict</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/managing-conflict/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=managing-conflict</link>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 15:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=371</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This episode is about how conflicts arise daily in elected office and there are respectful ways to manage it. The podcast also includes tips from Yadkin County Commissioner Kevin Austin and Morrisville Town Council Member Liz Johnson.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This episode is about how conflicts arise daily in elected office and there are respectful ways to manage it. The podcast also includes tips from Yadkin County Commissioner Kevin Austin and Morrisville Town Council Member Liz Johnson.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[Ep. 1: Managing Conflict]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This episode is about how conflicts arise daily in elected office and there are respectful ways to manage it. The podcast also includes tips from Yadkin County Commissioner Kevin Austin and Morrisville Town Council Member Liz Johnson.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/371/managing-conflict.mp3" length="35217792" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode is about how conflicts arise daily in elected office and there are respectful ways to manage it. The podcast also includes tips from Yadkin County Commissioner Kevin Austin and Morrisville Town Council Member Liz Johnson.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>18:19</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This episode is about how conflicts arise daily in elected office and there are respectful ways to manage it. The podcast also includes tips from Yadkin County Commissioner Kevin Austin and Morrisville Town Council Member Liz Johnson.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Coming Soon: New Show &#8216;Local Government in North Carolina&#8217;</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2018/11/16/coming-soon-to-sog-podcasts-new-show-local-government-in-north-carolina/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=coming-soon-to-sog-podcasts-new-show-local-government-in-north-carolina</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 17:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=283</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The water we drink, the streets we drive on, the police and fire protection we rely on – local governments provide these and other services every day. They set the parameters for quality of life in your community. Local Governments are close to you, but how much do you really [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The water we drink, the streets we drive on, the police and fire protection we rely on – local governments provide these and other services every day. They set the parameters for quality of life in your community. Local Governments are close to you, but ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>trailer</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[Teaser of 'Local Government in North Carolina']]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>00</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The water we drink, the streets we drive on, the police and fire protection we rely on – local governments provide these and other services every day. They set the parameters for quality of life in your community. Local Governments are close to you, but how much do you really [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/283/coming-soon-to-sog-podcasts-new-show-local-government-in-north-carolina.mp3" length="1740242" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The water we drink, the streets we drive on, the police and fire protection we rely on – local governments provide these and other services every day. They set the parameters for quality of life in your community. Local Governments are close to you, but how much do you really [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/LocalGovtinNC__iTunes.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:12</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The water we drink, the streets we drive on, the police and fire protection we rely on – local governments provide these and other services every day. They set the parameters for quality of life in your community. Local Governments are close to you, but how much do you really [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/LocalGovtinNC__iTunes.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>New Show: Local Government in North Carolina</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/new-show-local-government-in-north-carolina/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-show-local-government-in-north-carolina</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=289</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The water we drink, the streets we drive on, the police and fire protection we rely on – local governments provide these and other services every day. They set the parameters for quality of life in your community. Local Governments are close to you, but how much do you really [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The water we drink, the streets we drive on, the police and fire protection we rely on – local governments provide these and other services every day. They set the parameters for quality of life in your community. Local Governments are close to you, but ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[Teaser of 'Local Government in North Carolina']]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>00</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The water we drink, the streets we drive on, the police and fire protection we rely on – local governments provide these and other services every day. They set the parameters for quality of life in your community. Local Governments are close to you, but how much do you really [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/289/new-show-local-government-in-north-carolina.mp3" length="1740242" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The water we drink, the streets we drive on, the police and fire protection we rely on – local governments provide these and other services every day. They set the parameters for quality of life in your community. Local Governments are close to you, but how much do you really [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:12</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The water we drink, the streets we drive on, the police and fire protection we rely on – local governments provide these and other services every day. They set the parameters for quality of life in your community. Local Governments are close to you, but how much do you really [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Coming Soon: New Show ‘A Day in the Life’</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2018/11/15/coming-soon-new-show-a-day-in-the-life/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=coming-soon-new-show-a-day-in-the-life</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=304</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Welcome to “A Day in the Life.” This is a production of the Center for Public Leadership and Governance at the UNC-Chapel Hill School of Government. Each episode is a short podcast on the trials and tribulations newly elected local officials face each day as they serve their first year [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Welcome to “A Day in the Life.” This is a production of the Center for Public Leadership and Governance at the UNC-Chapel Hill School of Government. Each episode is a short podcast on the trials and tribulations newly elected local officials face each da]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>trailer</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[Teaser of 'A Day in the Life']]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>00</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Welcome to “A Day in the Life.” This is a production of the Center for Public Leadership and Governance at the UNC-Chapel Hill School of Government. Each episode is a short podcast on the trials and tribulations newly elected local officials face each day as they serve their first year [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/304/coming-soon-new-show-a-day-in-the-life.mp3" length="970448" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Welcome to “A Day in the Life.” This is a production of the Center for Public Leadership and Governance at the UNC-Chapel Hill School of Government. Each episode is a short podcast on the trials and tribulations newly elected local officials face each day as they serve their first year [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ADayInTheLife__iTunes.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>0:40</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Welcome to “A Day in the Life.” This is a production of the Center for Public Leadership and Governance at the UNC-Chapel Hill School of Government. Each episode is a short podcast on the trials and tribulations newly elected local officials face each day as they serve their first year [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ADayInTheLife__iTunes.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Season 02, Episode 06: Obtaining Permanency</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2017/01/26/season-02-episode-06-obtaining-permanency/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=season-02-episode-06-obtaining-permanency</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=225</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this last episode, you’ll learn about permanent outcomes for the family and child, with a discussion of two opposite outcomes: a child’s reunification with his/her parents and the child’s adoption after a termination of parental rights. Find out what happens in our remaining court case! &#160;]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this last episode, you’ll learn about permanent outcomes for the family and child, with a discussion of two opposite outcomes: a child’s reunification with his/her parents and the child’s adoption after a termination of parental rights. Find out what ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
	<itunes:title><![CDATA[Obtaining Permanancy]]></itunes:title>
	<itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
	<itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this last episode, you’ll learn about permanent outcomes for the family and child, with a discussion of two opposite outcomes: a child’s reunification with his/her parents and the child’s adoption after a termination of parental rights. Find out what happens in our remaining court case! &#160;]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/225/season-02-episode-06-obtaining-permanency.mp3" length="45384574" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this last episode, you’ll learn about permanent outcomes for the family and child, with a discussion of two opposite outcomes: a child’s reunification with his/her parents and the child’s adoption after a termination of parental rights. Find out what happens in our remaining court case! &#160;]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>31:30</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this last episode, you’ll learn about permanent outcomes for the family and child, with a discussion of two opposite outcomes: a child’s reunification with his/her parents and the child’s adoption after a termination of parental rights. Find out what happens in our remaining court case! &#160;]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>The Child’s Voice in Court: The Role of the Guardian ad Litem</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2017/01/12/the-childs-voice-in-court-the-role-of-the-guardian-ad-litem/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-childs-voice-in-court-the-role-of-the-guardian-ad-litem</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=221</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[We’re back with Episode 5, “The Child’s Voice in Court: The Role of the Guardian ad Litem,” for our Beyond the Bench Season 2 podcast. In this episode, we take a break from our court cases to focus on the child. Find out how the child’s perspective is represented in [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[We’re back with Episode 5, “The Child’s Voice in Court: The Role of the Guardian ad Litem,” for our Beyond the Bench Season 2 podcast. In this episode, we take a break from our court cases to focus on the child. Find out how the child’s perspective is re]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[We’re back with Episode 5, “The Child’s Voice in Court: The Role of the Guardian ad Litem,” for our Beyond the Bench Season 2 podcast. In this episode, we take a break from our court cases to focus on the child. Find out how the child’s perspective is represented in [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/221/the-childs-voice-in-court-the-role-of-the-guardian-ad-litem.mp3" length="59086180" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[We’re back with Episode 5, “The Child’s Voice in Court: The Role of the Guardian ad Litem,” for our Beyond the Bench Season 2 podcast. In this episode, we take a break from our court cases to focus on the child. Find out how the child’s perspective is represented in [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>41:01</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[We’re back with Episode 5, “The Child’s Voice in Court: The Role of the Guardian ad Litem,” for our Beyond the Bench Season 2 podcast. In this episode, we take a break from our court cases to focus on the child. Find out how the child’s perspective is represented in [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Season 02, Episode 04: The Case Plan &#8211; In and Out of Court</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2016/12/15/season-02-episode-04-the-case-plan-in-and-out-of-court/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=season-02-episode-04-the-case-plan-in-and-out-of-court</link>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 15:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=214</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[At the end of our last episode, one of our two cases ended when the court dismissed it after concluding the child was not neglected. But in our other case, the case where the children were living with their parents in a van in the woods without adequate shelter, food, [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[At the end of our last episode, one of our two cases ended when the court dismissed it after concluding the child was not neglected. But in our other case, the case where the children were living with their parents in a van in the woods without adequate ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[At the end of our last episode, one of our two cases ended when the court dismissed it after concluding the child was not neglected. But in our other case, the case where the children were living with their parents in a van in the woods without adequate shelter, food, [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/214/season-02-episode-04-the-case-plan-in-and-out-of-court.mp3" length="53666678" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[At the end of our last episode, one of our two cases ended when the court dismissed it after concluding the child was not neglected. But in our other case, the case where the children were living with their parents in a van in the woods without adequate shelter, food, [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>37:15</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[At the end of our last episode, one of our two cases ended when the court dismissed it after concluding the child was not neglected. But in our other case, the case where the children were living with their parents in a van in the woods without adequate shelter, food, [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Season 02, Episode 03: The Trial: Adjudicating Neglect</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2016/12/02/season-02-episode-03-the-trial-adjudicating-neglect/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=season-02-episode-03-the-trial-adjudicating-neglect</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 06:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=209</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode, through interviews with district court judges, a county department of social services attorney and a parent attorney, we will talk about the hearing where the court decides if the child is neglected and what happens afterwards.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, through interviews with district court judges, a county department of social services attorney and a parent attorney, we will talk about the hearing where the court decides if the child is neglected and what happens afterwards.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, through interviews with district court judges, a county department of social services attorney and a parent attorney, we will talk about the hearing where the court decides if the child is neglected and what happens afterwards.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/209/season-02-episode-03-the-trial-adjudicating-neglect.mp3" length="35455464" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, through interviews with district court judges, a county department of social services attorney and a parent attorney, we will talk about the hearing where the court decides if the child is neglected and what happens afterwards.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>24:36</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode, through interviews with district court judges, a county department of social services attorney and a parent attorney, we will talk about the hearing where the court decides if the child is neglected and what happens afterwards.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>Season 02 Episode 02: The System Responds</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2016/11/18/season-02-episode-02-the-system-responds/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=season-02-episode-02-the-system-responds</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 06:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=204</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In today’s episode, through interviews with county department social workers and attorney, the state Guardian ad litem program, a parent attorney, and district court judges, we’ll discuss how the county department responds to a report of suspected neglect and when court action is needed. This area of the law has its [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In today’s episode, through interviews with county department social workers and attorney, the state Guardian ad litem program, a parent attorney, and district court judges, we’ll discuss how the county department responds to a report of suspected neglec]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In today’s episode, through interviews with county department social workers and attorney, the state Guardian ad litem program, a parent attorney, and district court judges, we’ll discuss how the county department responds to a report of suspected neglect and when court action is needed. This area of the law has its [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/204/season-02-episode-02-the-system-responds.mp3" length="45489418" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In today’s episode, through interviews with county department social workers and attorney, the state Guardian ad litem program, a parent attorney, and district court judges, we’ll discuss how the county department responds to a report of suspected neglect and when court action is needed. This area of the law has its [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>31:33</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In today’s episode, through interviews with county department social workers and attorney, the state Guardian ad litem program, a parent attorney, and district court judges, we’ll discuss how the county department responds to a report of suspected neglect and when court action is needed. This area of the law has its [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S02 Episode 01: Without a Home</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2016/11/04/s02-episode-01-without-a-home/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s02-episode-01-without-a-home</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 13:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=197</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In today’s episode, through interviews with homeless shelter providers and district court judges, we’ll talk about what homelessness looks like, whether it’s neglect and whether you need to make a report to county department. &#160;]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In today’s episode, through interviews with homeless shelter providers and district court judges, we’ll talk about what homelessness looks like, whether it’s neglect and whether you need to make a report to county department. &#160;]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In today’s episode, through interviews with homeless shelter providers and district court judges, we’ll talk about what homelessness looks like, whether it’s neglect and whether you need to make a report to county department. &#160;]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/197/s02-episode-01-without-a-home.mp3" length="43404986" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In today’s episode, through interviews with homeless shelter providers and district court judges, we’ll talk about what homelessness looks like, whether it’s neglect and whether you need to make a report to county department. &#160;]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>30:05</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In today’s episode, through interviews with homeless shelter providers and district court judges, we’ll talk about what homelessness looks like, whether it’s neglect and whether you need to make a report to county department. &#160;]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S02 Episode 00: Welcome to Season 2 of Beyond the Bench</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2016/10/31/s02-episode-00-welcome-to-season-2-of-beyond-the-bench/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s02-episode-00-welcome-to-season-2-of-beyond-the-bench</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=187</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Welcome to Season 2 of Beyond the Bench, a podcast by the NC Judicial College at the UNC School of Government. Season 2 tells the story of homelessness, neglect and the child welfare system in NC. During this Season, we’ll talk about what family homeless looks like, whether homelessness is [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Welcome to Season 2 of Beyond the Bench, a podcast by the NC Judicial College at the UNC School of Government. Season 2 tells the story of homelessness, neglect and the child welfare system in NC. During this Season, we’ll talk about what family homeless]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Welcome to Season 2 of Beyond the Bench, a podcast by the NC Judicial College at the UNC School of Government. Season 2 tells the story of homelessness, neglect and the child welfare system in NC. During this Season, we’ll talk about what family homeless looks like, whether homelessness is [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/228/s02-episode-00-welcome-to-season-2-of-beyond-the-bench.mp3" length="3769364" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Welcome to Season 2 of Beyond the Bench, a podcast by the NC Judicial College at the UNC School of Government. Season 2 tells the story of homelessness, neglect and the child welfare system in NC. During this Season, we’ll talk about what family homeless looks like, whether homelessness is [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>2:37</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Welcome to Season 2 of Beyond the Bench, a podcast by the NC Judicial College at the UNC School of Government. Season 2 tells the story of homelessness, neglect and the child welfare system in NC. During this Season, we’ll talk about what family homeless looks like, whether homelessness is [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S01 Episode 05: Anne Precythe on Community Corrections</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2016/09/06/s01-episode-05-anne-precythe-on-community-corrections/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s01-episode-05-anne-precythe-on-community-corrections</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 07:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=166</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[During the final episode of Season 1, faculty member Jamie Markham interviews the North Carolina Director of Community Corrections Anne Precythe. She talks about what is was like when she first started working in the area of probation, how it has changed, and what it looks like today. If you [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[During the final episode of Season 1, faculty member Jamie Markham interviews the North Carolina Director of Community Corrections Anne Precythe. She talks about what is was like when she first started working in the area of probation, how it has changed]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[During the final episode of Season 1, faculty member Jamie Markham interviews the North Carolina Director of Community Corrections Anne Precythe. She talks about what is was like when she first started working in the area of probation, how it has changed, and what it looks like today. If you [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/166/s01-episode-05-anne-precythe-on-community-corrections.mp3" length="32604106" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[During the final episode of Season 1, faculty member Jamie Markham interviews the North Carolina Director of Community Corrections Anne Precythe. She talks about what is was like when she first started working in the area of probation, how it has changed, and what it looks like today. If you [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>33:57</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[During the final episode of Season 1, faculty member Jamie Markham interviews the North Carolina Director of Community Corrections Anne Precythe. She talks about what is was like when she first started working in the area of probation, how it has changed, and what it looks like today. If you [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S01 Episode 04: Shea Denning on DWI and Jamie Markham on Absconding from Probation</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2016/08/22/s01-episode-04-shea-denning-on-dwi-and-jamie-markham-on-absconding-from-probation/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s01-episode-04-shea-denning-on-dwi-and-jamie-markham-on-absconding-from-probation</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=162</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Faculty member Shea Denning explores the procedures and punishments associated with impaired driving and ponders their effectiveness in addressing the DWI problem. In the second segment, host Jeff Welty talks with colleague Jamie Markham about the concept of absconding from probation. If you like what you hear, please rate us [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Faculty member Shea Denning explores the procedures and punishments associated with impaired driving and ponders their effectiveness in addressing the DWI problem. In the second segment, host Jeff Welty talks with colleague Jamie Markham about the concep]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Faculty member Shea Denning explores the procedures and punishments associated with impaired driving and ponders their effectiveness in addressing the DWI problem. In the second segment, host Jeff Welty talks with colleague Jamie Markham about the concept of absconding from probation. If you like what you hear, please rate us [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/162/s01-episode-04-shea-denning-on-dwi-and-jamie-markham-on-absconding-from-probation.mp3" length="34933045" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Faculty member Shea Denning explores the procedures and punishments associated with impaired driving and ponders their effectiveness in addressing the DWI problem. In the second segment, host Jeff Welty talks with colleague Jamie Markham about the concept of absconding from probation. If you like what you hear, please rate us [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>36:22</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Faculty member Shea Denning explores the procedures and punishments associated with impaired driving and ponders their effectiveness in addressing the DWI problem. In the second segment, host Jeff Welty talks with colleague Jamie Markham about the concept of absconding from probation. If you like what you hear, please rate us [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S01 Episode 03: Judge Carl Fox</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2016/08/08/s01-episode-03-judge-carl-fox/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s01-episode-03-judge-carl-fox</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 07:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=160</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[In this episode we talk with North Carolina Superior Court Judge Carl Fox. Before becoming a judge, Fox was the first African American district attorney in the state. We talk about his life, work, and views about current criminal justice issues. If you like what you hear, please rate us [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode we talk with North Carolina Superior Court Judge Carl Fox. Before becoming a judge, Fox was the first African American district attorney in the state. We talk about his life, work, and views about current criminal justice issues. If you l]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode we talk with North Carolina Superior Court Judge Carl Fox. Before becoming a judge, Fox was the first African American district attorney in the state. We talk about his life, work, and views about current criminal justice issues. If you like what you hear, please rate us [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/160/s01-episode-03-judge-carl-fox.mp3" length="26697213" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode we talk with North Carolina Superior Court Judge Carl Fox. Before becoming a judge, Fox was the first African American district attorney in the state. We talk about his life, work, and views about current criminal justice issues. If you like what you hear, please rate us [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>27:48</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[In this episode we talk with North Carolina Superior Court Judge Carl Fox. Before becoming a judge, Fox was the first African American district attorney in the state. We talk about his life, work, and views about current criminal justice issues. If you like what you hear, please rate us [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S01 Episode 02: Chris McLaughlin on Social Media for Judges and Lawyers and Frayda Bluestein on Body Cameras and Public Records</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2016/07/25/s01-episode-02-chris-mclaughlin-on-social-media-for-judges-and-lawyers-and-frayda-bluestein-on-body-cameras-and-public-records/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s01-episode-02-chris-mclaughlin-on-social-media-for-judges-and-lawyers-and-frayda-bluestein-on-body-cameras-and-public-records</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=158</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[First, we talk with faculty member Chris McLaughlin and learn about the ethics rules that limit how lawyers and judges use social media. Next, faculty member Frayda Bluestein answers the question: do recordings made by body cameras worn by law enforcement officers qualify as public record under North Carolina law? [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[First, we talk with faculty member Chris McLaughlin and learn about the ethics rules that limit how lawyers and judges use social media. Next, faculty member Frayda Bluestein answers the question: do recordings made by body cameras worn by law enforcemen]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[First, we talk with faculty member Chris McLaughlin and learn about the ethics rules that limit how lawyers and judges use social media. Next, faculty member Frayda Bluestein answers the question: do recordings made by body cameras worn by law enforcement officers qualify as public record under North Carolina law? [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/158/s01-episode-02-chris-mclaughlin-on-social-media-for-judges-and-lawyers-and-frayda-bluestein-on-body-cameras-and-public-records.mp3" length="22930579" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[First, we talk with faculty member Chris McLaughlin and learn about the ethics rules that limit how lawyers and judges use social media. Next, faculty member Frayda Bluestein answers the question: do recordings made by body cameras worn by law enforcement officers qualify as public record under North Carolina law? [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>23:52</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[First, we talk with faculty member Chris McLaughlin and learn about the ethics rules that limit how lawyers and judges use social media. Next, faculty member Frayda Bluestein answers the question: do recordings made by body cameras worn by law enforcement officers qualify as public record under North Carolina law? [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S01 Episode 02: Chris McLaughlin on Social Media for Judges and Lawyers &#038; Frayda Bluestein on Body Cameras and Public Records</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/s01-episode-02-chris-mclaughlin-on-social-media-for-judges-and-lawyers-frayda-bluestein-on-body-cameras-and-public-records/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s01-episode-02-chris-mclaughlin-on-social-media-for-judges-and-lawyers-frayda-bluestein-on-body-cameras-and-public-records</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 07:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=83</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[First, we talk with Chris McLaughlin and learn about the ethics rules that limit how lawyers and judges use social media. Then, Frayda Bluestein answers the question, do recordings made by body cameras worn law enforcement officers qualify as public record under North Carolina law? If you like what you hear please rate [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[First, we talk with Chris McLaughlin and learn about the ethics rules that limit how lawyers and judges use social media. Then, Frayda Bluestein answers the question, do recordings made by body cameras worn law enforcement officers qualify as public reco]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[First, we talk with Chris McLaughlin and learn about the ethics rules that limit how lawyers and judges use social media. Then, Frayda Bluestein answers the question, do recordings made by body cameras worn law enforcement officers qualify as public record under North Carolina law? If you like what you hear please rate [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/83/s01-episode-02-chris-mclaughlin-on-social-media-for-judges-and-lawyers-frayda-bluestein-on-body-cameras-and-public-records.mp3" length="26669768" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[First, we talk with Chris McLaughlin and learn about the ethics rules that limit how lawyers and judges use social media. Then, Frayda Bluestein answers the question, do recordings made by body cameras worn law enforcement officers qualify as public record under North Carolina law? If you like what you hear please rate [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>24:46</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[First, we talk with Chris McLaughlin and learn about the ethics rules that limit how lawyers and judges use social media. Then, Frayda Bluestein answers the question, do recordings made by body cameras worn law enforcement officers qualify as public record under North Carolina law? If you like what you hear please rate [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S01 Episode 01: Mary Ann Tally on the Court System and Shea Denning on Distracted Driving</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2016/07/06/s01-episode-01-mary-ann-tally-and-shea-denning-on-distracted-driving/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s01-episode-01-mary-ann-tally-and-shea-denning-on-distracted-driving</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 17:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=155</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Faculty member John Rubin interviews North Carolina Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Tally. Tally was one of the first public defenders in the state and had a long career in indigent defense before taking the bench. Next, faculty member Shea Denning answers questions about the law of distracted driving, such as, [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Faculty member John Rubin interviews North Carolina Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Tally. Tally was one of the first public defenders in the state and had a long career in indigent defense before taking the bench. Next, faculty member Shea Denning answers]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Faculty member John Rubin interviews North Carolina Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Tally. Tally was one of the first public defenders in the state and had a long career in indigent defense before taking the bench. Next, faculty member Shea Denning answers questions about the law of distracted driving, such as, [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/155/s01-episode-01-mary-ann-tally-and-shea-denning-on-distracted-driving.mp3" length="28345790" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Faculty member John Rubin interviews North Carolina Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Tally. Tally was one of the first public defenders in the state and had a long career in indigent defense before taking the bench. Next, faculty member Shea Denning answers questions about the law of distracted driving, such as, [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>29:31</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Faculty member John Rubin interviews North Carolina Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Tally. Tally was one of the first public defenders in the state and had a long career in indigent defense before taking the bench. Next, faculty member Shea Denning answers questions about the law of distracted driving, such as, [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S01 Episode 04: DWI</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/s01-episode-04-dwi/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s01-episode-04-dwi</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 16:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=85</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/85/s01-episode-04-dwi.mp3" length="34933045" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>36:23</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S01 Episode 05: Anne Precythe</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/s01-episode-05-anne-precythe/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s01-episode-05-anne-precythe</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 16:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=86</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This concludes Season 1 of Beyond the Bench. We&#8217;re working hard on Season 2 and will be bringing those to you in the coming weeks.  If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This concludes Season 1 of Beyond the Bench. We&#8217;re working hard on Season 2 and will be bringing those to you in the coming weeks.  If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please em]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This concludes Season 1 of Beyond the Bench. We&#8217;re working hard on Season 2 and will be bringing those to you in the coming weeks.  If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/86/s01-episode-05-anne-precythe.mp3" length="32604106" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This concludes Season 1 of Beyond the Bench. We&#8217;re working hard on Season 2 and will be bringing those to you in the coming weeks.  If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>33:57</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This concludes Season 1 of Beyond the Bench. We&#8217;re working hard on Season 2 and will be bringing those to you in the coming weeks.  If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S01 Episode 03: Carl Fox</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/s01-episode-03-carl-fox/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=s01-episode-03-carl-fox</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 16:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=84</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[This week we talk to Judge Carl Fox about his path to If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[This week we talk to Judge Carl Fox about his path to If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[This week we talk to Judge Carl Fox about his path to If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/84/s01-episode-03-carl-fox.mp3" length="26697213" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[This week we talk to Judge Carl Fox about his path to If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>27:48</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[This week we talk to Judge Carl Fox about his path to If you like what you hear please rate us in your podcast app! If you have questions or topics for the show please email producer Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S01 Episode 00: Beyond the Bench is now in session</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/2016/06/29/beyond-the-bench-is-now-in-session/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=beyond-the-bench-is-now-in-session</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?p=118</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The UNC School of Government is excited to bring you &#8220;Beyond the Bench,&#8221; a podcast featuring interviews with people in and around the court system. We&#8217;ll be broadcasting episodes biweekly, so please listen in and tell us what you think. You can reach producer, Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The UNC School of Government is excited to bring you &#8220;Beyond the Bench,&#8221; a podcast featuring interviews with people in and around the court system. We&#8217;ll be broadcasting episodes biweekly, so please listen in and tell us what you think.]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The UNC School of Government is excited to bring you &#8220;Beyond the Bench,&#8221; a podcast featuring interviews with people in and around the court system. We&#8217;ll be broadcasting episodes biweekly, so please listen in and tell us what you think. You can reach producer, Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/118/beyond-the-bench-is-now-in-session.mp3" length="1531229" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The UNC School of Government is excited to bring you &#8220;Beyond the Bench,&#8221; a podcast featuring interviews with people in and around the court system. We&#8217;ll be broadcasting episodes biweekly, so please listen in and tell us what you think. You can reach producer, Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>00:01:35</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The UNC School of Government is excited to bring you &#8220;Beyond the Bench,&#8221; a podcast featuring interviews with people in and around the court system. We&#8217;ll be broadcasting episodes biweekly, so please listen in and tell us what you think. You can reach producer, Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S01 Episode 00: Beyond the Bench is now in session</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/teaser-about-this-show/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=teaser-about-this-show</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 19:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=14</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[The UNC School of Government is excited to bring you "Beyond the Bench," a podcast featuring interviews with people in and around the court system. We'll be broadcasting episodes biweekly, so please listen in and tell us what you think. You can reach producer, Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[The UNC School of Government is excited to bring you Beyond the Bench, a podcast featuring interviews with people in and around the court system. Well be broadcasting episodes biweekly, so please listen in and tell us what you think. You can reach produc]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[The UNC School of Government is excited to bring you "Beyond the Bench," a podcast featuring interviews with people in and around the court system. We'll be broadcasting episodes biweekly, so please listen in and tell us what you think. You can reach producer, Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/14/teaser-about-this-show.mp3" length="325760" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[The UNC School of Government is excited to bring you "Beyond the Bench," a podcast featuring interviews with people in and around the court system. We'll be broadcasting episodes biweekly, so please listen in and tell us what you think. You can reach producer, Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/BeyondBenchIcon.png"></itunes:image>
	
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>1:35</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[The UNC School of Government is excited to bring you "Beyond the Bench," a podcast featuring interviews with people in and around the court system. We'll be broadcasting episodes biweekly, so please listen in and tell us what you think. You can reach producer, Danielle Rivenbark at daniellp@sog.unc.edu.]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:image href="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/BeyondBenchIcon.png"></googleplay:image>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>

<item>
	<title>S01 Episode 01: Mary Ann Tally &#038; Shea Denning on Distracted Driving</title>
	<link>https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast/episode-1/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=episode-1</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 17:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<dc:creator><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></dc:creator>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/?post_type=podcast&#038;p=5</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[Professor John Rubin interviews Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Tally. Judge Tally was one of the first public defenders in the state and had a long career with indigent defense before taking the bench. Then, Shea Denning gives answers questions about the law of distracted driving like, can you text while [...]]]></description>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Professor John Rubin interviews Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Tally. Judge Tally was one of the first public defenders in the state and had a long career with indigent defense before taking the bench. Then, Shea Denning gives answers questions about the ]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<content:encoded><![CDATA[Professor John Rubin interviews Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Tally. Judge Tally was one of the first public defenders in the state and had a long career with indigent defense before taking the bench. Then, Shea Denning gives answers questions about the law of distracted driving like, can you text while [...]]]></content:encoded>
	<enclosure url="https://podcast.sog.unc.edu/podcast-download/188/episode-1.mp3" length="325760" type="audio/mpeg"></enclosure>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[Professor John Rubin interviews Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Tally. Judge Tally was one of the first public defenders in the state and had a long career with indigent defense before taking the bench. Then, Shea Denning gives answers questions about the law of distracted driving like, can you text while [...]]]></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:explicit>clean</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:duration>0:40</itunes:duration>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]]></itunes:author>	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[Professor John Rubin interviews Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Tally. Judge Tally was one of the first public defenders in the state and had a long career with indigent defense before taking the bench. Then, Shea Denning gives answers questions about the law of distracted driving like, can you text while [...]]]></googleplay:description>
	<googleplay:explicit>No</googleplay:explicit>
	<googleplay:block>no</googleplay:block>
</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
