• Home
  • / Podcast
  • keyboard_arrow_right
  • keyboard_arrow_right
  • keyboard_arrow_right Episode 37: Barbour, Hollis, and Hunt

Episode 37: Barbour, Hollis, and Hunt

SOG Applications Team May 12, 2026 6


Background
share close
Turning State's
Turning State's
Episode 37: Barbour, Hollis, and Hunt
/

In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on March 4, 2026. In State v. Barbour, COA24-664 (N.C. Ct. App. Mar. 4, 2026), the Court of Appeals held the State presented sufficient evidence contradicting the defendant’s castle doctrine defense to warrant denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss. In State v. Hollis, COA25-239 (N.C. Ct. App. Mar. 4, 2026), the Court of Appeals found insufficient evidence to support the defendant’s conviction for keeping or maintaining a dwelling for the keeping or selling of controlled substances. And in State v. Hunt, COA23-890-2 (N.C. Ct. App. Mar. 4, 2026), the Court of Appeals vacated the defendant’s habitual felon sentence when his habitual felon indictment did not allege three sequential and nonoverlapping prior convictions.

Rate it
Previous post
Post comments (0)

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.