School of Government
Podcasts

Latest Episodes

Episode 44: Wise, Havens, and Moore

In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals in June 2026. In State v. Wise, No. COA25-683 (N.C. Ct. App. June 3, 2026), the Court of Appeals found no violation of the confrontation clause when the testifying expert reviewed and approved a toxicology report. In State v. Havens, No. COA25-592 (N.C. Ct. App. June 17, 2026), the Court of Appeals upheld the defendant’s convictions for secret peeping and sexual exploitation of a minor. And in State v. Moore, No. COA25-1049 (N.C. Ct. App. June 17, 2026), the Court of Appeals concluded the trial court did not err by admitting evidence of a separate instance of the defendant’s fleeing to elude arrest.

Episode 43: Phelps, Metcalf, and Tyson

In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on June 3, 2026. In State v. Phelps, No. COA25-934 (N.C. Ct. App. June 3, 2026), the Court of Appeals ruled that simultaneous possession of multiple weapons constitutes a single instance of possession of a weapon of mass death and destruction. In State v. Metcalf, No. COA25-624 (N.C. Ct. App. June 3, 2026), the Court of Appeals found that repeated unanswered phone calls in violation of a DVPO constitutes felony stalking. And in State v. Tyson, No. COA25-604 (N.C. Ct. App. June 3, 2026), the Court of Appeals held that sexual exploitation of a minor by solicitation does not require that the material solicited actually exist.

Episode 42: Dobson, Myers, and Holt

In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina appellate courts in May 2026. In State v. Dobson, 190PA24 (N.C. May 22, 2026), the Supreme Court held that the odor of marijuana is a factor to be considered under the totality of the circumstances for probable cause. In State v. Myers, No. COA25-631 (N.C. Ct. App. May 20, 2026), the Court of Appeals concluded the superior court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate two infractions. And in State v. Holt, No. COA25-560 (N.C. Ct. App. May 20, 2026), the Court of Appeals found a confrontation clause violation in a substitute analyst’s testimony on the defendant’s blood alcohol concentration.

Episode 41: Hague, Phillips, and Palmiter

In this episode, Hyde and Holbrook discuss three cases decided by the North Carolina appellate courts in May 2026. In State v. Hague, No. 225A24 (N.C. May 22, 2026), the Supreme Court concluded the trial court reversibly erred by excluding evidence of the victim’s prior convictions to show the defendant’s state of mind. In State v. Phillips, No. COA25-864 (N.C. Ct. App. May 6, 2026), the Court of Appeals found no confrontation clause violation in allowing a substitute analyst to testify to independent conclusions based on photographs. And in State v. Palmiter, No. COA25-338 (N.C. Ct. App. May 6, 2026), the Court of Appeals upheld the constitutionality of G.S. 14-318.5 making it a felony for a person providing care to or supervision of a child knowingly or wantonly to fail to report the disappearance of the child to law enforcement.

Episode 26: NC Criminal Debrief

This episode covers recent decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court and the North Carolina Supreme Court addressing Second Amendment rights and marijuana use, jury selection, and probable cause in the age of legal cannabis.